چکیده:
The disagreement between Kant and Allameh Tabataba'i in theological discussions is rooted in their disagreement regarding reason and epistemological sources. Disagreement in theological discussions is considered the basis of differences in anthropology and its position. Kant reduces the status of God to the level of a moral presupposition, and God becomes subject to the dictates of pure reason, having no right to deviate from the moral laws arising from pure reason. In all epistemological, teleological, legislative, and other domains, man is self-sufficient and independent of God. On the other hand, Kant's belief in the discussion of God's attributes contradicts his own philosophical foundations, because Kant considers any knowledge of God (even in practical reason) impossible and has no right to claim the proof of attributes for the Almighty or their recognition. However, Allameh believes in the possibility of knowing and proving the existence of God Almighty. According to him, God Almighty is self-evident and does not require proof; numerous internal and external verses are signs of the existence and attributes of God Almighty; definitive and irrefutable proofs demonstrate the existence and unity of the Almighty.
خلاصه ماشینی:
God in the Moral Philosophy of Kant and Allameh Tabataba'i( 1 Mohammad Ibrahim Fouladi 2 and Mohsen Gharavian 3 Abstract Keywords: Date received: 20/3/90 Date approved: 23/4/90 PhD researcher in contemporary theological currents of the Islamic world, Al-Mustafa International University, Imam Khomeini Higher Education Complex, Qom. Assistant Professor at Al-Mustafa International University, Imam Khomeini Higher Education Complex, Qom. Introduction The position and status of human beings in the system of existence express their value and dignity.
The Necessity of God's Existence for the Realization of the Highest Good From Kant's perspective, morality does not necessitate religion; that is, humans do not need God to know their duty, and the ultimate motivator of moral action is duty in itself, not obedience to divine commands.
In the kingdom of ends, we should not imagine God in an anthropomorphic way as a supreme moral legislator who commands tyrannically because of His unlimited right; rather, first, His laws must be proportionate to human sanctity; second, we should not interpret His mercy and benevolence in a way that makes us negligent of our moral and human responsibilities; rather, what is effective is the moral character and the effort of man himself, and God's benevolence is merely a compensator for human weakness (kant: 1998: 143).
2. Comparison of Belief in God and Monotheism in the Moral Philosophy of Kant and Allameh Tabataba'i God in Kant's Pure Reason Kant considers the proof and knowledge of God to be impossible.
(
, 
, 
)
