چکیده:
In this writing, first, religious texts related to the issue of interpretation by opinion (Tafsir bi al-Ra'y) and its condemnation were searched for in Shia and Sunni sources and Quranic verses, and then the opinions of Islamic scholars regarding this concept were examined. Finally, the identification of interpretation by opinion was carried out using the contents of narrations and linguistic and historical clues, resulting in the conclusion that what is meant by 'interpretation by opinion' in the narrative culture is a condemned method in explaining and expressing divine verses. Regarding the existence of interpretation by opinion in narrations, it was evaluated from four perspectives: interpretation by opinion in terms of source, purpose, subject, or mode of expression, and we found that interpretation by opinion should be considered a general concept related to the condemned method of understanding and interpreting the Quran; whether it is in terms of an invalid source and basis, or in terms of an improper purpose, which this meaning applies to all types of current verses and can also include speculative and probabilistic statements.
خلاصه ماشینی:
180); rather, it must be said that this form is usually accompanied by the expression of argumentation and dispute in the Quran or lying and slander against God; however, interpretation based on opinion is a general concept that refers to a specific method in understanding the Quran, whether it is done with knowledge of its incorrectness or out of ignorance, and whether its result happens to be reality or not; meaning, fundamentally, the selection of a wrong and baseless method is prohibited, just as the Holy Quran considers those who cast aspersions and accuse others to be liars and fabricators in the sight of God, even if their words might coincidentally be true (Al-Nur/13).
Al-Suyuti quotes Ibn al-Naqib Muhammad bin Sulayman al-Balkhi in the introduction of his tafsir, stating that there are five opinions regarding the hadith prohibiting interpretation based on opinion: 1) Interpretation without acquiring the sciences through which interpretation is permissible; 2) Interpretation of the ambiguous verses (mutashabihat) which no one knows except God; 3) An interpretation used to prove a corrupt school of thought, meaning the school of thought is the origin and the interpretation follows it; 4) Interpreting the divine intent in a definitive manner and without evidence; 5) Interpretation based on personal preference (istihsan) and whim (Al-Suyuti, 1973, Vol. 2, p.
(
, 
, 
)
