چکیده:
The aim of this writing is to depict and outline the external view of political participation in the Islamic government. Due to theoretical and technical reasons, political participation in Islamic society leads to political pluralism. The concept of political pluralism is the formation and legitimacy of political parties in Islamic society. Political parties can be divided into two important categories based on their geographical and ideological domains. With respect to the geographical domain, political parties are divided into two types: regional and national parties. From an ideological perspective, political parties and factions are divided into two large categories: Islamic parties and non-Islamic parties. Islamic parties, in turn, are distinguished into two categories: religious-theological parties and ijtihadi-jurisprudential parties. In this writing, our main effort is to provide a brief explanation of the advantages, disadvantages, and rules governing the political activities of ijtihadi-jurisprudential parties, taking into account the conditions of the Islamic society of Iran. Additionally, ideological-cultural pluralism is also briefly mentioned in the introduction of the discussion.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In the present article, one of the aspects of modern thought, namely the desire for the continuous reconstruction of order and the concern with replacing the old order with a new one to resolve crisis, is discussed.
In the present article, the crisis of modernity is introduced as the background for the emergence of "post-logic" in philosophical and social studies, and based on it, the relationship between the modern and the postmodern is discussed.
Such a conception is inconsistent with the basis of postmodern thought ______________________________ * ـ One of the most explicit expressions of modernity as 'ending an old order and a new beginning' can be found in 'Arendt's' definition of the phenomenon of 'revolution.
In any case, this approach indicates that postmodernism, rather than being a product of a fundamental transformation in modern life and the entry into a new political-social formulation, originates from a change in perspective toward oneself and the world and doubt regarding the possibility of changing existing orders toward improvement.
The emergence of the wave of post-Marxist, postmodern, and post-structuralist views is not a sign of a fundamental change in human societies; rather, these intellectual developments are the offspring of the challenging of modern Grand Narratives - whether left or right - and skepticism toward past thoughts.
(
, 
, 
)
