چکیده:
There is a growing awareness of the need for continuous actions towards dialogue among the world's religions, especially between Muslims and Christians. In this regard, what is new is not the reality of multiple religions, but rather internalizing the awareness of fundamental diversity within the consciousness of religious believers. With increasing awareness of diversity and plurality, the existence of other believers can no longer be regarded as strangers following strange and unfamiliar ways. Of course, profound diversity also poses problems in relations between followers of different sects. In this article, three current approaches—exclusivism, inclusivism, and pluralism—in the field of interreligious dialogue are examined; four preconditions for dialogue are proposed, and finally, three characteristics of human cognition and knowledge are mentioned.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Please view my views merely as a plan and a suggestion arising from my Christian heritage, and not as the final word, for the spirit and essence of dialogue is the expression and presentation of a viewpoint and then being prepared for the comments and responses of others from the perspective of their own religious experience and belief, and achieving a more correct and mutual understanding of one another.
But as soon as familiar relations were established between them, the possibility for closer cooperation emerged and reject those who are different from them simply for being "outsiders and others," and if they are not understandable, instead of merely tolerating them, has no choice but to accept that every religious belief must yield to the existence and presence of an infinite number of those who hold vastly different views on the fundamental meaning and purpose of life.
The Catholic Church does not deny any true and sacred matter in these religions and holds a deep respect for the way of life and conduct, beliefs, and teachings that, despite great differences from the teachings of that Church, are a reflection of the ray of truth that enlightens all humans.
In this view, serious dialogue is implicitly denied because the authentic diversity of various religions is ignored, and their teachings and laws are considered merely a popular manifestation of the general human aspiration and desire for transcendent matters.
(
, 
, 
)
