چکیده:
The foreign policy orientation of every country is shaped according to the goals of that political unit. The political goals of countries are also related to other components, including the ideology of the political system, national power, and its geopolitical position. Countries employ various methods to ensure their 'national interests' and 'national goals.' Therefore, foreign policy orientation and national role should be considered methods for achieving these goals. The necessities of involvement in Iran's foreign policy required that Iran's foreign policy orientation be aligned within the framework of the 'alliance and coalition' model with the West. Joining the Baghdad Pact and the SEATO Pact was in this direction. This aforementioned orientation increased the level of relations between Iran and America in military, defense, and security spheres and led to an increase in Iran's dependence on West-oriented structures; as a result of this process, 'US-centric patterns' became apparent in foreign policy behavior. Imam Khomeini (RA) protested against this process in his speeches. The June 5th (15 Khordad) movement should be considered the reaction of Iran's religious leaders against West-oriented patterns. This trend led to a secondary protest by religious leaders regarding the capitulation affair. Given the continuities in the foreign and security policies of Iran and the United States, the ground was prepared for the presentation of the 'Nixon Doctrine' in 1969. Within the framework of Dr. Richard Nixon, Iran played the national role of a 'regional leader.' This trend continued until 1979 and the era of the victory of the Islamic Revolution. With the victory of the Islamic Revolution, Iran's orientation and national role in the field of foreign policy were transformed and changed.
خلاصه ماشینی:
This orientation increased the level of relations between Iran and the United States in military, defense, and security fields and led to an increase in Iran's dependence on West-oriented structures; as a result of this process, "US-centric patterns" became apparent in foreign policy behavior.
Introduction The foreign policy orientation of countries and political units is mainly influenced by categories such as "national power," "the nature of political elites," "the level of national motivation," and the type of "regional and global mission" of high-ranking officials and leaders of the political system.
If we examine the aforementioned process in relation to the structural transformations of Iran after the coup of August 19, 1953 (28 Mordad 1332), we reach the conclusion that in the conditions and time period after the coup, relations of puppetry or comprehensive dependence were created between the "patron" (United States of America) and the "periphery" (the Shah's government and the Zahedi government).
It is natural that such a trend is considered based on the type of conceivable threats to the Iranian government and the United States of America during the years 1953-1979, as well as the national role in the field of foreign policy.
" (1) Given the Shah's psychology and also with an emphasis on America's strategic goals, the coup government was aware of Iran's geopolitical necessities and how American expectations regarding the regional and international behavior of officials would be met; from this time onward, Iran exited its "neutral" status and played a role in international conflicts as one of the allies of the United States.
(
, 
, 
)
