A look at a translation معرفی و نقد

خلاصه ماشینی:

If it had been done in a more correct and complete manner, accompanied by research and explanation of some ambiguous terms and the removal of certain errors and ambiguities in the text, it could have served as a significant reference and source for law students, researchers, and scholars, especially in international law; even though it has addressed the fundamental matters of international law, including the general principles of international law, human rights and international organizations, the law of international treaties, the law of the sea, the law of war and neutrality, legal methods for the peaceful settlement of disputes, and the international responsibility of states, albeit briefly, unfortunately, its due right has not been fully rendered in the translation. The following translation seems more expressive: "For example, the United Nations Charter stipulates that its amendments shall enter into force once they have been adopted and ratified by 32 members of the Organization, including all permanent members of the Security Council. " 3 — 6 — In Significance, "Modification" has been translated as "change," whereas the intended meaning is "amendment"; additionally, the phrasing in this section is somewhat awkward, although one reason for it is an editorial error. ] Please also pay attention to the following translation, which in our opinion is correct [by referring to the original text of the book]: "If it is proven that the parties to the treaty did not intend for the rights of a third country to be revocable or amendable by them and without the consent of the third party, then that right shall not be revoked or amended without its consent.