چکیده:
The main point of the article 'A Critical Attitude towards Research Methodology and Thinking in Islamic Philosophy' is that there is no diversity or branching in Islamic philosophy. This is a result of the absence of the element of criticism in this philosophy. The latter is itself a result of considering this philosophy as sacred, which in turn results from its unity with religion. Since religion is viewed as a sacred matter outside and above the realm of identification and criticism. In this article, all these claims are criticized and responded to, and it has been proven that: neither is Islamic philosophy devoid of diversity, nor does it lack the element of criticism; rather, criticism has always been present in it. Furthermore, it is not religious in the sense that the author of the article 'Critical Attitude' intends, and (most importantly) Islam does not forbid the involvement of reason in understanding religion or consider religion superior to identification and criticism; on the contrary, it strongly recommends a rational understanding of religion and considers it centered around reason. Additionally, some of the contradictions and instabilities in the arguments of the aforementioned article's author are also pointed out.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The belief in the rule "the particular is neither a trader nor an acquirer" from the side of Avicenna and almost all Islamic thinkers indicates their lack of belief in the All-Knowing nature of God and points to their lack of adherence to Sharia; however, since the foundation of the religious character of philosophy has been laid, this apparent view of semi-independence gradually loses its color in the centuries after Avicenna, such that in the works of Mulla Sadra, the Quran is introduced as the highest source of philosophical thought" (p.
Of course, philosophers have dealt with religious categories and have discussed especially God, which is a common issue between religion and philosophy, but when and where has a philosopher claimed that my word is the same as what religion says and is superior to criticism and objection?
7- If Avicenna, in the issue of the temporal origination of the world and the knowledge of God (and in the latter issue, almost all Islamic thinkers according to the author's claim), stands against religion in such a way that, according to the author, he contradicts the explicit text of the Quran, how does he consider this matter to be merely a superficial appearance of independence?
The author considers the views of several Western philosophers as authoritative and claims that religion is not rational and is not a realm of proof and reasoning, yet he does not refer to the heavenly book he believes in to see what logic that book itself holds in this regard.
(
, 
, 
)
