A look at: Industrial ownership, distribution and pricing in capitalism, socialism and Islam مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

Abstract In this short article, the aim is to compare industrial ownership, profit distribution, and pricing in the economic systems of capitalism, socialism, and Islam. However, the points considered in the six subjects are as follows: First subject: Limited ownership in Islam; second subject: A brief statement on prohibited earnings (Makasib Muharramah); third subject: Government facilities and their distribution; fourth subject: Reference to some financial payments in Islam such as Khums and Zakat; fifth subject: Investigating the legitimacy of profit comparatively (among the three systems of capitalism, socialism, and Islam). As an example, in Iran, according to precise investigation and calculation, there is not even a single economic institution that has made significant progress using only its personal capital without using the banking system; the use of the banking system has been and remains common, ranging from sixty percent to one hundred percent of investment, and this issue is considered the secret of wealth accumulation in the private sector. (1) Although small production workshops existed sporadically during that period and craftsmen in the surroundings and outskirts were engaged in producing tools, implements, and manufactured goods needed by the people, the existing capitals in the societies of those days played their role more in the trade sector, and in the industrial sector, despite the existence of numerous workshops, the share of capital was still not very signifi ______________________________ 1 - Ronald Mich, A Research into the Theory of Labor-Value, p. Thus, capital emerged as an important factor of production that must claim a major share of the product, and a new type of profit was recognized, which resulted from the use of capital in the industrial sector and provided extensive possibilities for capital accumulation.