چکیده:
The aim of this writing is to depict and outline the external view of political participation in the Islamic government. Political participation, for theoretical and technical reasons in Islamic society, leads to political pluralism. The concept of political pluralism is the formation and legitimacy of political parties in Islamic society. Political parties can be divided into two important categories based on their geographical and ideological domains. With respect to the geographical domain, political parties are divided into two types: regional and national parties. From an ideological perspective, political parties and factions are divided into two large categories: Islamic parties and non-Islamic parties. Islamic parties, in turn, are distinguished into two categories: religious-theological parties and ijtihadi-jurisprudential parties. In this writing, our main effort is to provide a brief explanation of the advantages, disadvantages, and rules governing the political activities of ijtihadi-jurisprudential parties, considering the conditions of the Islamic society of Iran. Additionally, ideological-cultural pluralism is also briefly mentioned in the introduction of the discussion.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Given the manifold and diverse theories in Islamic jurisprudence, assessing the position of pluralism in Islamic thought will only be possible if its relationship with the following three cases is carefully examined: a) Islamic-political theories b) Islamic sources and texts c) Islamic political history Muslim political theories have gained significant dispersion and diversity in terms of the structure and nature of different types of "authority," but generally, they can be divided into two major groups: ancient and modern, which of course, the authoritative aspect of past theories, compared to new perspectives has been thicker, and new ideas mostly show more or less pluralistic tendencies.
In a pluralistic society where political-national unity and social values are provided and guaranteed based on a set of objective principles and beliefs accepted by all groups, the ruling party or faction is always in conflict and competition with rival parties, striving to provide policies and programs that can ensure maximum public interest and therefore maintain the largest volume of popular support.
This category of political parties and groups, while believing in Shiite principles and foundations, only have differences and "competition" regarding the means and methods of government and the administration of public affairs; differences that are, in principle, either resulting from jurisprudential viewpoints or are the result of "the authority of the people in recognizing and determining political issues," which is accepted in the system of Islamic jurisprudence.
This type of pluralism, arising from Sharia and Islamic foundations, while strengthening consensus and motivations for national participation, and preventing political stagnation in society, makes supervision over the ruler or the ruling party and group possible and brings the interests of the system and the people closer.
(
, 
, 
)
