Sociology and Literature: Flaubert's Emotional Education مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

In the second lecture, I will attempt to show Flaubert's actual position within the social space and specify how this position, which is structurally similar to the position of the main protagonist—Frederic—allows the author, along with other factors, to perceive the social world depicted in the novel in a specific way, and also to determine how this position creates inclinations and tendencies in him so that he can ______________________________ 1School Edition : A type of printing in which the book is summarized and simplified so that students can use it. Because of the duality of these two worlds, Flaubert says, Frederic can "play double," a dual life that enables him, for a time, to delay making any decision that would have a lasting and or constraining one (it is enough to recall all those misunderstandings that are repeatedly created regarding Frederic's virtues and flaws), but the danger of accident, meaning an unpredictable coalition between social possibilities that each typically excludes the other, also lies in the simultaneous existence of several separate and distinct sets. The Sphere of Power, the Literary Sphere, and Habitus The reading of emotional education created the possibility of accessing two types of information: first, the representation of the structure of the sphere of power and the position of the author within that structure as obtained by Flaubert; and second, what I have termed the "Flaubert formula," a kind of generative scheme that serves as the fundamental structure of Flaubert's habitus, the basis of the Flaubertian construction of the social world.