چکیده:
Iran is located in an area with high earthquake risk. There are over 20 active faults with length of 500 km and also densely populated parts of the country have been rendered vulnerable to strong earthquakes. However, existence of eight faults of the main faults of Iran along with at least 18 faults with length of more than 100 km in Kerman province have turned the place into one of the riskiest areas of the country. For this reason, this research tries spatial distribution of absorbing centers in Kerman population compared to the high risk of seismic zones of the city. The results show that the total population of absorbing centers in Kerman is 22.2% of the training centers, 34.5% of health care centers, 22.2% of administrative centers, 14% of business centers, and 18.9 % of sports centers which are located across the threat of severe and very severe degradation. In other words, among 973 absorbing centers of population, 190 centers in Kerman are located in zones with high and very high damage and 206 centers are in areas with moderate damage; this means that among total centers of absorbing centers, 396 centers are located in zones with moderate to high risks. The importance of these centers, as well as aggregation of population in these centers, in urban spatial structure and prediction of approaches such as resisting, retrofitting of public education and crisis management is in reducing losses in the event of a seismic event that seems very likely.
خلاصه ماشینی:
For this reason, this research tries spatial distribution of absorbing centers in Kerman population compared to the high risk of seismic zones of the city.
ir On this basis and according to the importance of the issue, many studies have been conducted on the subject, including Nasiri (2016), who conducted a research of zoning earthquake hazard of the urban area of Urmia province and found that the acceleration of 0.
For this reason, this research tries spatial distribution of absorbing centers in Kerman population compared to the high risk seismic zones and the city planning principles in dealing with the study of seismic events.
For this reason, inappropriate spatial distribution of attractive centers in Kerman population has caused these centers to be mainly located in zones of moderate to severe intensity, which this factor drastically increases the vulnerability of these centers in the face of probable risks.
Table distribution level of sanitary-therapeutic centers to separate destruction intense Number of Center Destruction Intens 6 Very severe 23 Extreme 24 Medium 31 Low 0 Very low (View the image of this page)Fig. 7.
Graphs the distribution amount sanitary-therapeutic center due to destruction intense As shown in Figures 5 and 6, the highest number of care centers is 31 centers located in low level risk areas.
Distribution rates to administrative centers due to separate damage Number of Center Destruction Intense 8 Very severe 16 Extreme 25 Medium 54 Low 5 Very low (View the image of this page)Fig. 9.