چکیده:
The present article aims to investigate the appropriateness of the concepts introduced
by modern sciences of the sign, particularly by structural and poststructural
approaches, to studying God-man communication in the Quran. Such a conception of
communication can be described in terms of two models, namely, communication as
sending and communication as reading. These two concepts which represent an
uncompromising dualism in the modern approaches to the sign, come to a
compromise in the religious discourse, leading us not merely to conceiving a powerful
God but also to a powerful man.
مقاله حاضر بر آن است تا در پرتو رویکردهای نوین نشانه شناختی به ویژه نظریه های ساختگرا و
پساساختگرا مسئله ارتباط خدا و انسان در قرآن را مورد بررسی قرار دهد. این مفهوم از ارتباط را
می توان بر اساس دو مدل نشانه شناختی، یعنی ارتباط به منزله خواندن و ارتباط به منزله ارسال توضیح
داد. این دو مفهوم که همواره بیانگر یک دوگانگی آشتی ناپذیر در تفکر غرب بوده اند، در گفتمان
قرآنی به یکدیگر پیوند می خورند، به گونه ای که می توان هم از خدایی مقتدر سخن گفت و هم از
انسانی نیرومند.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Tarbiat Modares University Introduction If the way God relates to beings and creatures is considered a semiological question in essence, one can justifiably think of all theology and religious studies, and, at least, a major part of philosophy as simply instances of semiology.
As we previously noticed, the fact that man has no firm stand outside the Book leaves little room for the authority of man over the signs which are absolutely of God. In the Quran, we are exposed to a semiology basically different from the dual or the cooperative model we identify with speech, or, generally speaking, with ordinary communication.
(Jahangiri:1996: 427) The presence of God implied above can make man's position with regard to the Quran essentially different from the role assumed for the poststructural reader who is caught (more notably in the case of deconstruction) in the text of conflicting forces with no saving force to hang on.
It seems that the major theme linking the author- text to God-Book or God-man duality is the power relation between the two terms author and text which have so far been presented as uncompromising in the western thought.
It is clear that the above idea expressed by Derrida and Kearney differs from a purely secular or materialist position where God's authority is presented to be in the way of man's rule over nature."