چکیده:
In this article the idea of a contextual communication on the basis of a dialogical hermeneutics of cultures is introduced. To work contextually means to be open to the fact that different traditions appear on a scene with immanent terminologies, issues, and solutions as equal discoursive contributions from their individual perspective.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In his civilization theory Norbert Elias exclusively assumes an occidentally "civilized" behavior and regards the occident inherent of a leader's function from the occidental society - as a form of elite – today spread "Elias writes" be it through the population of occidentals, be it through the assimilation of the elite of other nations or peoples, occidental "civilized" behaviors over vast areas beyond the West, as formerly in the occident itself, from this or the mentioned elite certain courtly or trading centers behavioral models had spread (Elias, 1978).
Huntington's culture model and Elia's theory of civilization include chauvinistic features which cannot contribute to a real understanding.
We may assume that social, political, cultural or religious conflicts are construe and develope in the encounter of diverging interpretations of reality or individuals, which have farreaching consequences for the social matrix and also for the communication process.
Tolerance as an instrumental term Next should be the aim to seek overlappings in comparison and understanding of cultures with regard to their context to formulate rules that have been mutually found.
Who creates a generally binding theory of tolerance and the limits to it according to his opinion, assumes, eventhough unspoken, an essentialist term of culture, a unifying human image and a unifying type of ethics.
Three obstacles of communication should be considered on the way to an open understanding: the claim of truth and absoluteness, the claim of an intercultural inherent logic and the negative power.