چکیده:
پرونده هستهای ایران در 2006 از سوی شورای حکّام آژانس بینالمللی انرژی اتمی به شورای امنیت ارجاع و شورای امنیت تعدادی قطعنامه علیه ایران تصویب نمود. بهتبع قطعنامههای شورا، برخی دولتها اقدامات فراقطعنامهای زیادی علیه ایران وضع نمودند. توجیه این دولتها برای اقدامات فراقطعنامهای اقدامات متقابل بود. اقدامات متقابل در حقوق عدماشاعه بهدلیل خاص بودن این رژیم، با حقوق بینالملل عام تفاوتهایی دارد. پس از ورود شورا روابط حقوقی دولتها با یکدیگر و ایران پیچیدهتر نیز گشته بود.
The case of Iran's nuclear program was first referred to the UN Security Council by the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency in 2006, and UN Security Council adopted a number of resolutions against Iran. In consequence of these resolutions, some States apparently imposed more sanctions against Iran and went further beyond the resolutions. These States justified their acts under the rules of countermeasures. A countermeasure under the non-proliferation regime, which is an especial regime, is very different than general international law. After engaging of UNSC to the relations between Iran and other States, the situation became more sophisticated.
خلاصه ماشینی:
4. James Crawford, Alain Pellet and Simon Olleson, (Eds), Kate Parlett, (As), The Law of International Responsibility (Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2010), 471.
James Crawford, “Fourth Report on State Responsibility,” (New York: International Law Commission, 2001), p.
Willem Riphagen, Third Report on State Responsibility, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1982 vol.
Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz, “Third Report on State Responsibility,” (New York: International Law Commission, 1991), p.
(Trial Judgment), IT-95-16-T, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 14 January 2000, para 683; Case 68/86, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Communities, [1988] ECR: 855; Southern Bluefin Tuna (Australia-Japan; New Zealand-Japan), Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 4 August 2000; Reports of International Arbitral Awards (RIAA), vol.
Arbitral Award of 9 December 1978 in the Case Concerning the Air Service Agreement of 27 March 1946 between the United States of America and France, United Nations, Reports of International Arbitral Awards (RIAA), Vol. XVIII.
Arbitral Award of 9 December 1978 in the Case Concerning the Air Service Agreement of 27 March 1946 between the United States of America and France, United Nations, Reports of International Arbitral Awards (RIAA), Vol. XVIII.
International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries, November 2001, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp.
International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries, November 2001, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp.
International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries, November 2001, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp.