چکیده:
مفهوم کیفیت زندگی، عنصری کلیدی در سیاستگذاری و بررسی سیاستهای حوزة عمومی است و شاخص توسعة اجتماعی در نظر گرفته میشود؛ از این رو هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی مقالههای علمیپژوهشی منتشرشده در ارتباط با کیفیت زندگی روستایی ایران طی سالهای 1390 تا 1398 است. بدین منظور تمامی مقالههای منتشرشده طی این سالها ازنظر جنسیت و تعداد نویسندگان، تخصص نویسندگان، گرایشهای موضوعی، محدودههای مطالعهشده، سهم استانها و فصلنامهها بررسی شده است. جامعة آماری پژوهش، تمامی مقالههای منتشرشده طی سالهای 1390 تا 1398 شامل 95 مقاله بوده است. روش پژوهش، تحلیل محتواست و اطلاعات بهصورت کتابخانهای گردآوری شده است. دادهها با نرمافزار Excel و spss محاسبه و نتایج به شکل شماتیک نمایش داده شده است. نتایج نشان میدهد از 95 مقالة منتشرشده، حدود چهارپنجم را مردان نوشتهاند که حاکی از نیاز به مشارکت بیشتر زنان درزمینة تولید محتوای علمی دربارة کیفیت زندگی روستایی است؛ همچنین درزمینة تخصص نویسندگان، بیشترین تخصص به رشتة برنامهریزی روستایی و درزمینة وابستگی سازمانی نویسندگان، بیشترین وابستگی به دانشگاههای دولتی مربوط است که از این بین، دانشگاه تهران سرآمد دیگر دانشگاههاست. از میان موضوعات مدنظر نویسندگان، بیشترین تعداد مقالهها به ارزیابی کیفیت زندگی اختصاص دارد؛ همچنین دو فصلنامة پژوهشهای روستایی و پژوهشهای برنامهریزی روستایی توجه بیشتری به مقولة کیفیت زندگی داشتهاند.
Extended Abstract:Quality of life findings can be used to identify past strategy policies and design future policies. As such, the issue of quality of urban and rural life in recent decades has become one of the most important issues in Iran, so numerous seminars, conferences, and articles have been held and written to examine the quality of life. In recent years, experts have tried to look at this issue in Iran from a scientific point of view. The present study was conducted with the aim of analyzing the scientific research articles written on the quality of rural life in Iran during the years 2011 to 2019. The results of the study show that in terms of the gender status of the authors during the 9 years studied, out of 271 authors, 210 (77%) of them were men while 61 of them were women. Regarding the expertise of the authors, which was divided into 9 categories, the most specialized field was rural planning with 61.62% and urban planning with 9.23% while other fields had a small share. The organizational affiliation of authors was classified into six groups including State Universities, the Islamic Azad University, Payame Noor University, non-profit organizations, government institutions, and other institutions. Government institutions with a frequency of 233 (85.98%) had the highest level of organizational dependence suggesting a significant gap between the state universities and other institutions. Also, the number of authors and their articles showed that the highest number of authors (79.29%) have been co-outhors of one article. In other words, about three-quarters of the authors were present in only one article, which indicated the relatively low diversity of names in the published articles. To determine thematic trends and prevent dispersion, the topics presented in 20 categories were classified as follows. One of the most important topics for writers in the field of rural studies was the evaluation of the quality of life and its indicators with the frequency of 31 (32.63%) with the highest frequency among other topics. Other topics of interest to authors included dimensions, components, and levels of quality of life and the effects of the master plan on quality of life (5.26%); social dimensions of quality of life (7.37%), the spatial distribution of quality of life, the role of credits and targeted subsidies on quality of life, employment, income, and quality of life and tourism and quality of life (6.32%); factors affecting the quality of life and quality of life and housing (4.21%); satisfaction with the quality of life and the role of small towns and industrial towns on quality of life 3.16%; and agriculture and the quality of life (2.11%). Other thematic trends (1.05%), recived the least attention. Also, in the field of distribution of provinces studied by the authors, Kermanshah and Khorasan Razavi provinces with 10 articles were in the first rank,Fars province with 9 articles in the second rank, and Zanjan province with 8 articles in the third rank. Golestan, Sistan and Baluchestan, and Kurdistan were in the fourth rank with 7 articles, and Lorestan and Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad provinces were in the fifth place with 5 articles and other provinces were in the next positions. The results suggest that the discussion of rural studies, which has been less discussed so far, is important and should be given more attention to provide other researchers with such studies to provide a context for the development of villages. Keywords: Quality of Life, Quality of Rural Life, Scientific Research Article, Content Analysis. References:- Allahyari, M. S., Daghigh Masouleh, Z., & Eftekhary, H. (2015). Content Analysis of Specialized - Articles in Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences in Iran (2009-2013). Journal of Iranian Extension and Agriculture Sciences, 11(1), 229-248.- Anabastani, A. A., Rusta, M., Mohammadi, A., & Rafieian, S. (2015). Spatial Analysis of Factors Affecting the Quality of Life in Rural Settlements (Example: Simkan Section - Jahrom City). Journal of Regional Planning Quarterly, 5(18), 85-100.- Asa Burger, A. (2004). Media Analysis Methods. Translated by Parviz Ejlali. Media Studies and Research Center.- Askari, M., & Pourjouhari, A. (2016). Content Analysis and Implementation of Environmental Challenges in Iran and the World in the Last Fifteen Years (2001 to 2015- 2000 to 2014). Ecology, 42(4), 787-803.- Bardin, L. (1989). Lanalyse de Contenu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.- Bashiri, B., & Khorasani, M. A. (2017). Content Analysis of Articles in the Quarterly Journal of Rural Research between 2015 and 2010. Journal of Rural Research, 8(1), 136-149.- Borys, T. (2001). Jakosc Zycia Jako Kategoria Badawcza i Cel Nadrzedny. In Wachowiak A. ed., Jak Zyc, Wybrane Problemy Jakosci (pp. 17–41). Poznan: Wydawnictwo Fundacji „Humaniora.- Borys, T., & Rogala, P. (2008). Jakosc Zycia na Poziomie Lokalnym – Ujecie Wskaznikowe. Warszawa: UNDP.- Brauer, R., & Dymitrow, M. (2014). Quality of Life in Rural Areas: A Topic for the Rural Development Policy?. Bulletin of Geography, Socio–Economic Series, 25(25), 25-54.- Danayi, A., Shariat Panahi, M., & Mahdavi, M. (2018). Measurement of Quality of Life in Rural Areas (Bahmaei South Garmsiri Village in Bahmaei City of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provinces). Journal of Human Geography Research, 50(3), 727-747.- Ebrahimzadeh, I., Shahraki, A. A., Shahnaz, A. A., & Manouchehri Myandoab, A. (2016). Progressing Urban Development and Life Quality Simultaneously. Journal of City, Culture, and Society, 7(3), 186-193.- El Din, H. S., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H. E., & Elariane, S. A. (2013). Principles of Urban Quality of Life for a Neighborhood. HBRC Journal, 9(1), 86-92.- Ghaedi, M., & Golshani, A. (2016). Content Analysis Method from Quantitative to Qualitative. Journal of Psychological Methods and Models, 7(23), 57-82.- Michalska-Zyła, A., & Marks-Krzyszkowska, M. (2018). Quality of Life and Quality of Living in Rural Communes in Poland. Journal of European Countryside, 10(2), 280-299.- Mirzaeian, B., Rahmani, B., Razavian, M., & Faraji Rad, A. (2016). Measurement of Quality of Life in Rural Settlements (Case Study: Central Part of Islamabad Gharb City). Journal of Territorial Geographical Quarterly, 13(49), 1-11.- Mohammadi, S., Tayeb Nia, S. H., Taba, B., & Davoodi, A. (2017). Analysis of the Effects of Rural Guide Projects on Improving the Quality of Life of Villagers (Case Study: Villages of Khavumirabad Section of Marivan City). Quarterly Journal of Human Resource Planning Studies, 12(2), 391-411.- Nevado-Pena, D., Lopez-Ruiz, V. R., & Alfaro-Navarro, J. L. (2019). Improving Quality of Life Perception with ICT Use and Technological Capacity in Europe. Journal of Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119734.- Rahim Bakhsh, F., Habib, F., & Gorgani, S. A. (2019). Investigating the Quality of Life in the Villages of Darban Astaneh and Baba Peshman in Lorestan Province. Housing and Rural Environment, 165, 129-140.- Rasoulzadeh Aqdam, S., Adlipour, S., & Ramezani, A. (2016). Meta-Analysis of Urban and Rural Quality of Life Research in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Lifestyle Sociology, 2(7), 129-164.- Soroush Mehr, H., Aezami, M., Yaeghoob, A., & Mehregan, N. (2017). Evaluation of Quality of Life in Iran Based on Fuzzy Logic. Journal of Social Welfare Scientific-Research Quarterly, 17(65), 69-102.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The share of universities in rural quality of life studies دانشگاه تعداد نويسنده سهم دانشگاه دانشگاه تعداد نويسنده سهم دانشگاه تهران 38 14,02 شيراز 2 0,74 فردوسي 29 ١٠,٧٠ گلستان 3 1,11 اصفهان 32 ١١,٨١ شهيد چمران اهواز 1 0,37 بوعليسيناي همدان 12 ٤,٤٣ غيرانتفاعي آباده 1 0,37 آزاد 24 ٨,٨٦ آيت الله بروجردي 1 0,37 پيام نور 15 ٥,٤٥ محقق اردبيلي 4 1,48 تربيت مدرس 14 ٥,١٧ علوم انتظامي امين 1 0,37 ياسوج 9 ٣,٣٢ هرمزگان 1 0,37 علامه طباطبايي 4 1,48 تبريز 5 1,85 رازي کرمانشاه 6 2,21 زابل 5 1,85 زنجان 23 8,49 ايلام 1 0,37 باهنر کرمان 1 ٠,٣٧ علميکاربردي 1 0,37 خوارزمي 14 ٥,١٧ کردستان 1 0,37 بهشتي 7 2,58 گرگان 2 0,74 مازندران 5 ١,٨٥ حکيم سبزوار 1 0,37 سيستان و 7 ٢,٥٨ ادارة منابع طبيعي و آبخيزداري 1 0,37 بلوچستان بابل جمع کل 271 منبع : يافته هاي پژوهش ، ١٣٩٩ در ارتباط با نويسندگان پرکار در نوشتن مقاله هايي با موضوع کيفيت زندگي، فقط ٥ نويسنده بيشترين تعـداد مقالـه را داشته اند؛ حمدالله سجاسي قيداري با ٦ مقاله و داوود جميني، حمزه رحيمي، مسعود مهدوي و مريم قاسمي هرکدام با ٤ مقاله .