چکیده:
گسیختگی نظام شهرنشینی و مشکلات خاص زندگی شهری مدرن، ضرورت توجه همه جانبه به راهبردها و راه حل های سودمند برای بهینه سازی زندگی ساکنان شهرها را روشن ساخته است. در این میان داشتن شهری پایدار و آرمانی شاید مهمترین نیاز بشر امروزی است. استراتژی توسعه شهری رویکردی نوین از طرف بانک جهانی و سازمان ائتلاف شهرها، به منظور توسعه پایدار شهری، کاهش فقر و تعالی جوامع انسانی متداول شد. این دیدگاه بر چهار شاخص حکمروایی خوب، بانکی بودن، رقابتی بودن و قابل زندگی بودن استوار است. مقاله حاضر میکوشد شاخصهای فوق را در شهر کاشان ارزیابی و انطباقپذیری این شهر را با اصول CDS سنجش کند. پژوهش حاضر توصیفی - تحلیلی و دارای ماهیتی کاربردی میباشد. حجم نمونه با استفاده از نرمافزار Sample Power، 160 پرسشنامه برآورد گردید. طبقهبندی و ارزشدهی شاخصها با استفاده از طیف پنج گزینهای لیکرت صورت گرفته است و قلمرو زمانی تهیه دادهها را میتوان مربوط به سال 1398 دانست. تهیه نقشه های مورد نیاز نیز با استفاده از نرم افزار ArcGIS انجام شده است. برای تجزیهوتحلیل توصیفی و استنباطی دادهها از آزمون آماری T-Test در نرمافزار SPSS و جهت تبیین و مدلسازی اثرات نیز از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری در نرمافزار AMOS استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از آزمون T تک نمونهای نشان داد که میانگین شاخصهای حکمروایی خوب، رقابتی بودن، بانکی بودن، قابل زندگی بودن به ترتیب 26/2، 58/2، 91/2، 65/2، میباشند و با مقدار استاندارد فاصلهدارند و ضعیف برآورد میشوند. تحلیل یافتههای منتج از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری بیانگر این است که مقدار وزن رگرسیونی شاخص RMSEA برابر با (059/) است که نشاندهنده برازش خوب مدل میباشد. همچنین تحلیل نتایج حاصل از مدلسازی نشان داد از میان ابعاد موردسنجش بُعد قابل زندگی بودن بیشترین بار عاملی را با وزن رگرسیونی (98/0) و مقدار خطای (000/0) P Value = به خود اختصاص داده است.
The breakdown of the urban system and the particular problems of modern urban life have highlighted the need for comprehensive attention to strategies and beneficial solutions to optimize the lives of urban dwellers. In the meantime, having a stable and ideal city is perhaps the most important human need today. Urban Development Strategy A new approach has been adopted by the World Bank and the Coalition of Cities in order to sustainably develop the city, reduce poverty, and improve human societies. This view is based on the four indicators of good governance, banking, competitiveness and viability. The present article tries to evaluate the above indicators in Kashan city and to measure the adaptability of this city with CDS principles. The present study is descriptive-analytical and has an applied nature. The sample size was estimated to be 160 questionnaires using Sample Power software. Classification and evaluation of indicators has been done using a range of five Likert options and the time domain of data preparation can be considered as related to the year 1398. The required maps have also been prepared using ArcGIS software. To analyze the descriptive and inferential analysis of data, T-Test statistical test was used in SPSS software and to explain and model the effects, structural equation modeling was used in AMOS software. The results of the single-sample T test showed that the average indicators of good governance, competitiveness, banking, and viability were 2.26, 2.58, 2.91, 2.65, respectively, and were far from the standard value and weak. Are estimated. Analysis of the findings from structural equation modeling indicates that the regression weight of the RMSEA index is equal to (059 /), which indicates a good fit of the model. Also, the analysis of the results of the modeling showed that among the measured dimensions, the viability dimension has the highest factor load with regression weight (0.98) and error value (0.000) P Value =.Keywords: Urban Development Strategy, Principles (CDS), Sustainable Development, Structural Modeling, Kashan CityExtended abstractIn response to uncertain future conditions, managerial inefficiency, and declining quality of life in cities, a new approach to programming literature has emerged since 1999 called Urban Development Strategy by the Coalition of Cities, which aims to increase competitiveness, efficiency, and improve the quality of housing. Improving management. The Urban Development Strategy seeks to improve the city's performance on a sustainable basis, based on factors such as sustainable economic growth, improving living opportunities, reducing poverty, improving environmental conditions and public health, especially for informal settlements and strata. Poor and low-income, consider and evaluate the planning system in Kashan city in the field of urban policies is still traditional thinking and based on comprehensive and detailed plans at the local level and the promising document 1404 of the Islamic Republic of Iran and five-year development plans as high-level programs It is regional and national that is the main feature of all these centralized programs (top-down approach). Therefore, the need to change traditional urban approaches and adopt new and efficient approaches, including urban development strategy (CDS) to change the current development process in Kashan, is more than ever; Because the grand goal of strategic development is to create a livable environment for all, along with social justice, economic efficiency and environmental sustainability. The present study seeks to answer the question of what is the state of Kashan in terms of CDS indicators? The present study is based on the purpose of the study, applied research and in terms of method, descriptive-analytical research. To determine the sample size, Sample power software was used which, considering the alpha of 0.5, the confidence level of 0.95 and the one-way test of the sample size of the research 160 The person was estimated. The data collected through the questionnaire were analyzed using AMOS software and statistical analysis methods such as single sample T test in SPSS software environment. The first hypothesis analyzed and analyzed the dimensions of good urban governance in Kashan city, which due to the low average of indicators (2.26) of the standard value of number (3) indicates the poor situation of Kashan city in terms of governance dimensions and the first hypothesis of the approved research it placed. The second hypothesis evaluates the competitiveness index in relation to urban development strategy and according to the comparison with the significant level in alpha level of 5%, the results indicate the unfavorable situation of this index with average (2.85) and the second hypothesis is confirmed. The third hypothesis of being a banking indicator in Kashan city was evaluated and analyzed. The results of the average T-test of a single sample of the research showed that this indicator is not in an acceptable situation with an average (2.91) and is poorly estimated. That is, the unfavorable nature of Kashan city is confirmed in terms of banking dimensions. The fourth hypothesis of the research showed that the livable or biodegradable city index was analyzed and analyzed in the contract. Being with an average (2.65) is in unfavorable conditions and the fourth hypothesis of the research, ie the weakness of this dimension, was proved after the urban development strategy in Kashan city. In total, the results of the single T-test of the average of the four mentioned indicators are equal to 2.6 and are less than the mean limit (number 3), which indicates the poor status of the four principles of urban development strategy in Kashan. To more accurately identify and analyze the variables, structural equation modeling was used. The results of the second factor factor model showed that the viability factor accounted for the highest factor load with a value of 0.98 and then the competitive factor with a factor load of 91. 0.0 is in the second place and the two factors of banking and governance with regression weights of 0.76 and 0.72 are in the third and fourth place.Keywords: Urban Development Strategy, Principles (CDS), Sustainable Development, Structural Modeling, Kashan City.