چکیده:
پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی چارچوب و شناسایی اولویتها جهت ساماندهی کاربری اراضی در حوضه جنوبی دریاچه ارومیه با استفاده از کاربرد تکنیک تحلیل ذینفعان انجام شد. برای انجام این تحقیق، جمعآوری و تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات در دو فاز کمی و کیفی صورت گرفت. لذا، ابتداء به صورت پیمایشی رفتار بهرهبرداران کشاورزی منطقه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. سپس برای جمعبندی نتایج به دست آمده، از روش "تحلیل ذینفعان" استفاده شد. در فاز اول (کمی) تحقیق، جامعه آماری شامل تمامی بهرهبرداران بخش کشاورزی منطقه بودند. حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران پیشبینی گردید. در نتیجه، تعداد 153 نفر به عنوان نمونه در دو مرحله انتخاب شدند. ابزار اصلی تحقیق در این بخش، پرسشنامه بود. برای تایید روایی بخشهای مختلف پرسشنامه از متخصصان بهره گرفته شد و به کمک ضریب آلفا کرونباخ پایایی آن تایید شد. در فاز فاز کیفی برای انجام این فاز، 18 متخصص با توجه به موضوع و اهداف تحقیق بهصورت هدفمند انتخاب شدند. نتایج کلی به دست آمده حاکی از آن است که رفتارهای"تغییر در روش کاشت محصولات"، "تغییر کاربری اراضی" و "استفاده از ارقام بومی"، در گروه بهرهبرداران دارای تغییر کاربری، و رفتارهای "مهاجرت فصلی سرپرست خانوار به مکان دیگر برای کار"، "افزایش میزان استفاده از کود و سموم شیمیایی" و "مهاجرت دائمی به شهر"، در گروه بهرهبرداران فاقد تغییر کاربری به ترتیب در اولویتهای اول تا سوم هستند. همچنین، با توجه به نتایج فاز کیفی تحقیق، مدیریت اراضی کشاورزی از جمله موضوعاتی است که مورد توجه ویژهای قرار گرفته و ذینفعان متعددی در آن سهیم هستند. مهمتر آنکه در بیشتر بخشها کشاورزان در سطح مزارع در کنار سازمانهایی همچون جهاد کشاورزی، صدا و سیما، جنگلها، مراتع و آبخیزداری، آب منطقه و ستاد احیاء دریاچه ارومیه به عنوان ذینفع اصلی و کلیدی جانمایی شده است. لذا این ذینفعان را میتوان در گروه تاثیرگذاران قرار داد.
IntroductionOne of the important factors for success in organizing and managing natural resources, including agricultural lands, is identifying stakeholders and studying their behavior. An analysis of the potential, roles, demands, information, and knowledge of project stakeholders to interact and coordinate with them will greatly help to estimate their expectations. Without accurate and complete identification of all stakeholders in the management and organization of agricultural land, the logical and acceptable results of decisions cannot be assured. As such, stakeholder involvement and participation is considered the cornerstone of planning and organizing any work, so that it is one of the tools for achieving sustainability and democracy. Stakeholder involvement and participation is considered the cornerstone of planning and organizing any work, so that it is one of the tools for achieving sustainability and democracy. Stakeholder participation leads to the use of common potential, knowledge, and values, which reduce differences in opinions and increase trust between people and officials. This study was conducted to design a framework and identify priorities for organizing land use in the southern basin of Lake Urmia using "stakeholder analysis" method. Data and MethodThis study, with a sociological approach, attempted to analyzing the behavior of users in the field of land use planning in the south basin of Urmia Lake. Hence, this research was closed in 2 steps. First, to understand the farmers' behavior, a survey research will conduct. The research statistical population were the all farmers in the south basin of Urmia lake who were 153 farmers were selected as the sample by a randomized cluster sampling method in the second stage. The sample size is predicted using Cochran formula. The instrument for collecting data was a questionnaire which its validity was confirmed by a panel of experts. The reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α=0.74). The data were analyzed using SPSS software. Finally, the "stakeholder analysis" method was used to summarize the results. To perform this section, 28 specialists were selected purposefully according to the subject and objectives of the research. Results and DiscussionResults showed that behaviors of "change in the method of planting crops", "change of land use" and "use of native cultivars", in the group of farmers with change of land use, and behaviors of "seasonal migration of the head of the household to another place of work", "increase of use" "Chemical fertilizers and pesticides" and "permanent migration to the city" in the group of farmers without land use change are in the first to third priorities. Also, according to the results, agricultural land management is one of the topics that have received special attention and many stakeholders. More importantly, in most sectors, farmers have been identified as the main and key stakeholders. Therefore, these stakeholders can be included in the group of influencers. It can be concluded that stakeholders are divided into two groups. The first group comprises only those who are directly affected and benefit from agricultural land-use management. Other groups of actors are individuals or groups who, in addition to benefiting from their interests, are influential. Also, Land use change decisions of farmers in the south basin of the Urmia Lake essentially aimed at improving farmers’ economic status through collective actions, such as shifting to animal husbandry a, cultivating products with a shorter growth period changes in planting method and changes in irrigation system. Therefore, improving the livelihoods and food security of farmers is a key in Iran, like other developing countries. In addition to this component, the lack of competent professionals and managers has led to a tougher challenge. ConclusionThe results obtained in the stakeholder analysis showed that farmers at the farm level are key stakeholders and the main pillar in the design, presentation, and implementation of conservation programs to organize lands, along with the Jihad Agricultural Organization and other government organizations. Designing a framework and identifying priorities for organizing land use as a development approach to use all available capacities requires attention to the institutional dimensions of development, especially the analysis of key stakeholders and the use of various tools by expanding coordination and interaction. The important result is that local communities, especially local leaders, see themselves as partners in the program, which leads to cooperation in the program as well as strengthening their weaknesses. Also, the results showed that farmers are at the heart of land management, particularly in rural and agricultural areas. However, the results show that their behavior in the face of environmental change is more of a personal decision and to the extent of the capacity to exploit individually rather than as a group or following a regular schedule. This makes the existing challenge more critical than before.