چکیده:
The system of governance in multi-firm projects that requires implementing a variety of companies under the consortium agreement can affect the performance of the consortium. According to the literature review and the recognition of the research gap, the researchers found it necessary to identify the components and criteria of good governance in the context of mega multi-firm projects in a consortium. The purpose of this study is to grasp the deep-seated influence of governance on mega multi-firm projects in a consortium and an understanding of utility criteria. Using qualitative and exploratory research methods, six upstream consortium of South Pars Project were investigated. Grounded theory was used to analyze the data and find any probable relationships between them. In the first step, the components of the existing governance and its consequences were identified; then, by repeating the interviews with the research community, the components of the good governance consisting of the structure, process, and governance mechanism were introduced. Finally, an optimum governance model was proposed based on the criteria of good governance and observing the interests of all the stakeholders in the project.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Government Management, Volume 9, Number 4, Winter 1396 ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 667 In this research, considering the importance of the development projects of the South Pars gas fields (Iran's upstream oil and gas industries), the aim is to answer the question of what are the components of good governance in large-scale multi-organizational civil partnership projects.
) Dollinger & Golden (1992) The extent to which each partner achieves their goals Golati (1998) Financial indicators Lim & Mohammad (1999) Partial view (time, cost and quality) and general (stakeholder satisfaction) Project management is (success of project management process and stakeholder satisfaction) + product Bakarini (1999) Project (user satisfaction, usefulness and market share) The first group (time, cost, safety and environment) + the second group (affected by criteria Chan (2004) The first group are placed including quality, efficiency and satisfaction of different members Participating in the project ) Azouhon & colleagues (2007) Project performance + partner performance + participation management performance + satisfaction gained from Participation Team satisfaction (along with users of the project product), completion of the project based on three Turner (2018) Criteria of time, cost and quality (obtaining stakeholder satisfaction resulting from achieving these three criteria ) and creating value for shareholders Considering the limitations and assumptions of this research, the findings show that few studies have been conducted in the field of investigating the components of good governance in the context of participatory projects, and more focus has been on the concepts of corporate governance, project and the impact of various factors on their performance.
(
, 
, 
)
