چکیده:
According to the report of the Holy Quran, after the condemnation of criminals is issued on the Day of Judgment, Hell is asked whether there is still space remaining for the habitation of disbelievers and strangers? Hell responds: Are there any criminals left? Three interpretations have been presented regarding this: some commentators consider this noble verse to be a type of allegory and an expression of 'the language of state' (lisan al-hal), where God asks Hell through the language of creation and Hell responds in the language of state. Another group believes that the hereafter is the abode of life and real existence, and that Hell also possesses life and consciousness, and the speech refers to an actual response. Alongside these views, a few commentators argue for the omission of the 'mudaf' (annexed noun), saying that God's address is to the guardians of Hell, and God wants to take a confession from them. After presenting the documents and reasons for each of these views and examining them, this writing has reached the conclusion that the second view should be preferred while remaining committed to the functions of the first theory; because by posing this question and answer, the verse intends to indicate that God's wrath and punishment are not incapable of encompassing all criminals, and by considering the content of the verse as real, what those who claim the verse is allegorical are seeking can also be fulfilled. Therefore, until a solid and acceptable reason is found to turn away from the literal meaning of the verse, one should not turn away from it.
خلاصه ماشینی:
However, the question we face is whether considering the content of the Quran as real is in conflict with accepting any kind of acknowledgment of metaphor and interpretation, or whether in reaching the goals and objectives of the Quran, one can obtain a justification for turning away from the literal meaning of the text and deviating toward its symbolism, or if there is a third option that, while believing in the truthfulness of the concepts of the Quran, takes into account its lofty goal of transcendence and knowledge-giving, and without passing over the literal form of the text and submitting to a type of interpretation, follows a rule-based interpretation rather than an unregulated one?
<H4>Summary</H4> It seems that the proponents of the theory that this verse is metaphorical and symbolic are pursuing the purpose that the Holy Essence of Truth, through this question and answer, wants to point out the reality that the wrath of God Almighty and His punishment are not incapable of encompassing all criminals and fulfilling the retribution they deserve;<FootNote No="114" Text=" A point that the author of Tafsir Jawami al-Jami and Fayd Kashani had explicitly stated and which was referred to.
Tusi, Muhammad bin Hasan, al-Tibyan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an, edited by Ahmad Qasir Amili, Beirut, Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, n.
(
, 
, 
)
