خلاصه ماشینی:
\ A very important point to mention is that the majority and the public of Muslims consider the method of the Mujassimah and Mushabbihah to be incorrect, because interpreting this category of God's verses based on their outward appearance is impossible due to the existence of many other verses such as {/«لیس کمشله شیء؛/} 'There is nothing like Him' (Ash-Shura 11/), which transcends God from resemblance to creatures.
&%02603QTAG026G% Rashid Rida, when explaining the rule and principle of the Salaf's approach to the attribute verses, which he himself has repeatedly acknowledged and considers himself a follower of, mentions the transcendence of God as one of the important foundations of this method and says: "The Salaf, when encountering any of the attributes that God has attributed to Himself, while these attributes were used in the Arabic language for creatures, acted according to a rule and principle; and that rule was that they would believe in these attributes in their perfection and with the capacity for them in God, and along with this faith (and affirmation), they would transcend God from resemblance to creatures" (previously cited, Vol. 8, p.
3- Following the Madhhab of the Salaf In Al-Manar, much reference is made and stated regarding the difference between the two interpretive schools, Salaf and Khalaf, in the interpretation of the attribute verses: "The Madhhab of the Salaf is belief in the outward meaning of the verses along with the transcendence of God from what the outward meaning of these verses necessitates, and the delegation (tafwid) of the true meaning of these verses to God; whereas the Madhhab of the Khalaf is the Ta'wil (interpretation) of these verses through metaphor and allusion, in order to reconcile reason and tradition" (previously cited, Vol. 3, p.