چکیده:
One of the important issues in theoretical philosophy of history is the problem of the 'direction of historical movement.' Many philosophers of history consider the movement of history to be towards integration, and matters such as the increasing complexity of social relations, scientific progress, the growth of technology and industry, and the improvement of the material conditions of human societies are introduced as criteria for historical integration, which generally observe the upward transformations of the material dimensions of human life over time. However, Martyr Professor Motahhari has proposed a new perspective regarding integration in history and has presented a specific explanation and a distinct criterion different from the views of philosophers of history under the title 'Innate or Human Integration of History.' In this article, first the main claim, foundations, and dimensions of the Professor's view are briefly presented; then the ambiguities of the Professor's view and ways to resolve them are provided; and finally, it is proven that the view of 'Innate or Human Integration of History,' at the level of a noteworthy hypothesis worthy of study and further testing, possesses scientific validity, but at the level of a theory, it does not possess scientific validity.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In the book "The Social Evolution of Man in History," Master Motahhari divides the various dimensions of progress in human societies into four categories: 1.
He believes: As a result of the comprehensive nature of his evolution, man has gradually reduced his dependence on the natural and social environment and has increased a kind of detachment—which is equivalent to dependence on creed, faith, and ideology—and in the future, he will reach complete spiritual freedom, meaning complete dependence on creed, faith, path, and ideology (Motahhari, 1390, Vol. 24, p.
3. The Innate Nature of History Another important point in explaining the view of the innate evolution of history is that, based on Master Motahhari's insight, history not only possesses philosophical authenticity but also possesses an innate nature (fitra) and character; meaning that within the phenomenon of history, like individuals, specific inclinations are hidden.
Considering the clarity of the Professor's statement regarding the criterion of the perfect man and given the existential connection between human beings, society, and history, it can be said: the criterion for the evolution of society and history from Professor Motahhari's perspective is the harmonious growth of all human values in the individuals of society, which is in fact the same growth and blossoming of innate human talents that he has presented both in the discussions of "the philosophy of history" and in the book "A Critique of Marxism.
(
, 
, 
)
