چکیده:
The recognition of man is one of the foundations of the worldview of any school of thought, and providing a specific type of anthropology has an impact on justifying and explaining many subjects within a school. Moral nature, as one of the main indicators in Professor Motahhari's anthropology, plays an important role. From his perspective, man, in terms of innate and internal structure, possesses both moral awareness and a tendency toward goodness and hatred of evil. Man possesses these two components by virtue of his existential structure, and no form of social suggestion or imposition can influence them. Due to this innate and non-acquired structure, man is independent of religion and religious texts in some respects, and in other respects, has a close dependence on them. Although Professor Motahhari's view is reflective in some aspects, in its entirety, it is a view that provides guidance in justifying many religious subjects.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Examining "Moral Nature" and "The Dependencies of Morality on Religion" from the Perspective of Professor Motahhari Bijan Mansouri Abstract Understanding human beings is one of the foundations of the worldview of any school of thought, and providing a specific type of anthropology has an impact on justifying and explaining many subjects within a school.
Therefore, from Professor Motahhari's perspective, if we limit human nature to only the lower self and material desires and wants, the result will be specific preferences and conventionalities, and subsequently falling into the trap of moral relativism (ibid.
Therefore, in Professor Motahhari's view, this theory justifies both the general moral rulings related to society and other general rulings directed toward other aspects such as the relationship of human with self, God, and the world (ibid.
It clearly emerges from Professor Motahhari's critique of Kant's words that human conscience first understands all goods and evils and all moral generalities and details, and secondly, it is not reason that, by analyzing circumstances, limits the absolute rulings of conscience in behaviors, but rather conscience itself is what both issues absolute rulings (regarding dispositions) and also (in behaviors) tends toward relativity.
It was previously mentioned that he considers all morality (in the sense that he himself accepts) to exist within the human conscience and deems a type of introspection and self-knowledge necessary for understanding these rules (which relates to the epistemological relationship between ethics and religion).
(
, 
, 
)
