چکیده:
Usurpation of Fadak and anger of Hazrat Zahrā (as) at Abu Bakr and not to talk with him until her martyrdom are certain facts in Islamic history. But it was not long ago that a doubt was raised by some Salafi scholars regarding the Zuhrī’s Idrāj in the traditions related to this anger. They look on the traditions of Fatima's anger at Abu Bakr as Zuhrī’s editing and declare them rejected. The present article is written in a library method and with an analytical approach in order to evaluate and answer this doubt. The findings indicate that, contrary to the claims, the expressions of anger and separation are not from Zuhrī’s editions, and in most of the texts of these traditions, the narrator of the story of anger and separation is 'Ayesha, and there is no editing. In addition to that, the story of Hazrat Zahrā (as) not speaking and her anger at Abu Bakr has also been narrated through non-Zuhrī. In addition, Sunni scholars believe that the Idrāj in the hadith is forbidden (ḥarām) and causes the narrator to fall from justice. Also, they did not mention this hadith as one of the hadiths with Idrāj, but they admitted to its content and tried to justify her anger at Abu Bakr.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Hadith Research Scientific Semiannual Journal, Year 14, Autumn and Winter 2022, Issue 28 Scientific-Research Article, Pages: 39-56 Critique of the Notion of Zuhri's Interpolation in the Hadith of Fadak * Ali Bajy ** Yusuf Farshadnia *** Mohammad Javad Haji Abolghasem Dolabi Abstract Among the indisputable facts of Islamic history are the usurpation of Fadak and the anger of Lady Zahra (AS) towards Abu Bakr, and her refusal to speak to him until the time of her martyrdom.
For this reason, in * recent years, some contemporaries, instead of weakening the chain, have taken another approach and claimed that the phrase "the anger of Lady Zahra (AS) and her refusal to speak to Abu Bakr" is among the insertions (Idraj) of Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri—the narrator of the narration—and with this pretext, they tried to cast doubt on the authenticity of this phrase so that they could strip it of its authority, while at the same time not causing harm to * ش سطح دانه and * ش سطآمخت.
83) In Salih bin Kaysan's report from Zuhri, the anger of Lady Zahra (SA), her estrangement, and her not speaking to Abu Bakr are connected to the text of Aisha's narration without any Idraj.
77) In Walid bin Muqari's report as well, the anger of Lady Zahra (SA), her estrangement, and her not speaking to Abu Bakr are connected to the text of Aisha's narration without any Idraj.
556) In the report of Muhammad bin Abdullah as well, the anger of Lady Zahra (SA), her estrangement, and her not speaking to Abu Bakr are connected to the text of Aisha's Hadith without any Idraj and without the word "qala" (he said) being separated from the text.
(
, 
, 
)
