چکیده:
Dan Quayle, who is himself a journalist priest, holds extreme views regarding complete trust in science and, based on that, denies the knowledge of religion and its teachings. In these reviews, he has fallen into many contradictions, fallacies, and injustices, such that he introduces religion as a myth and legend and considers all its teachings to be in the same category as superstitious teachings of magic and talismans; and despite his exclusive attention to Christianity, he has generalized all the results of the investigation between science and Christianity to all religions, even Islam. However, almost all of his approaches toward religion and its relationship with science are essentially subject to fundamental criticism. The present writing is considered a critical review of his views.
خلاصه ماشینی:
([10]) Critique: In this approach, the noteworthy point is that religion is perceived only as an organizer, and the values themselves arise from human and mortal desires, while this duty, as mentioned in other characteristics of Christianity, is actually the duty of Christianity, not all religions; because other religions are far better and higher than Christianity in being knowledge-giving, guiding, and value-assigning, and in fact, all religions undertake the duty of providing knowledge, guidance, and individual, social, moral, material, and worldly valuations, and order in these matters is considered a secondary program and plan for religions, not their sole duty.
([20]) The existence of this characteristic in Christianity led to the emergence of content-based inconsistencies for action and belief within this religion, whereas Islam has presented its foundation and basis spontaneously and self-fundamentally, without following or copying any culture or philosophy, to such an extent that the Quran, calling everyone to struggle and research, says: If this Quran had been from anyone other than God, you would certainly have found much discrepancy in it.
(
, 
, 
)
