چکیده:
Structure analysis is one of the ways to study literary texts. In this method, the text is divided by dividing the text according to the structure and the reason for its use. The present study tries to identify and extract the words and claims of another person about Imam Ali (AS) and his actions, using a descriptive-analytical method To categorize and evaluate the structure and method of the answer provided by that Imam. How Amir Sokhan has quoted another claim about himself in a method and tone, What expressive and technical structure did the respondent use to answer the respondent so that he would judge the absurdity of the allegation and, on the contrary, judge its legitimacy? The study shows that Imam (AS) tried to present another simple and non-technical claim as structurally as possible. Instead, he strengthens his words by using various rhetorical techniques, especially oaths, to help persuade the audience through the intervention of those means of expression
خلاصه ماشینی:
Hadith Research Scientific Semiannual Journal, Year 12, Autumn and Winter 2020, Issue 24 Research Article Pages: 339-362 Alignment and Analysis of the Expressive Structure of Another's Claim and Imam Ali's (AS) Response to it in Nahj al-Balagha * Ali Najafi Ivaki ** Marzieh Sadat Kadkhodaei Abstract Structural analysis is considered one of the methods for examining literary texts; in this method, the text under consideration is studied by dividing it based on its structure and the reason for its use.
In response to the claim of negligence in taking revenge on the killers of Uthman Sermon 166 of Nahj al-Balagha begins by presenting a claim and responding to the claimants; in this way, after pledging allegiance to His Eminence, groups of companions said to him: "If only you had punished the people who rebelled against Uthman"; meaning, if only you had retaliated against the rebels against Uthman; thus, His Eminence was indirectly accused of negligence in this speech, and their claim was formed on this basis.
In any case, the comparison of the narrated claim indicates that merely conveying the concept was important in its mention, and with this same mindset, the presented sentence is devoid of any rhetorical or literary structure is; but in contrast, the response is strengthened with a verbal noun indicating emphasis, metonymic expression, an oath by the name of God, emphasis, concrete imagery, impossibility, and simile, so that the speaker's steadfastness in speech and behavior is evoked for the audience.
(
, 
, 
)
