چکیده:
Among the divine attributes and actions, the discussion of Bada' holds a special position, to the extent that it has been emphasized that God has not sent any prophet without taking a covenant from him regarding divine Bada'. In the debate with Sulayman al-Marwazi, Imam Reza (as), based on Quranic verses, has addressed the proof and brief explanation of the truth of the concept of Bada'. In this discourse, by referring to the views of some prominent Shia scholars, including traditionists, theologians, and philosophers, the meaning of Bada' has been explained. Among the scholars' commentaries in this regard are the reports of Mirza Mahdi Isfahani (may he rest in peace), based on which various aspects of the issue of Bada' have been clarified in detail.
خلاصه ماشینی:
109) Therefore, the late Saduq considers Bada' to mean manifestation and the openness of God's hand in the erasure, affirmation, advancement, and delay of affairs, and similar to abrogation in matters based on the interests of servants at different times.
Sayyid Murtada Sayyid Murtada says: Bada' can be considered in its true sense, meaning manifestation, in such a way that after a Divine command or prohibition, with the occurrence and manifestation of the commanded act, a state arises that did not exist before, and this is a type of manifestation from the perspective of God. Therefore, in the noble verse "لنبلونكم حتی نعلم المجاهدین", emphasis is placed on the manifestation of knowledge after knowledge, meaning that We test you so that We may know that your jihad has come into existence in the external world, because according to the word "نعلم", before the realization of the existence of jihad, the knowledge of jihad in the external world did not exist.
, on longevity and the increase of sustenance, says the following in the explanation of Bada': The reports and verses indicate this matter: that God has created two tablets, and whatever occurs of the creatures is recorded in those two tablets: one is the Preserved Tablet (Lawh al-Mahfuz), which is in accordance with Divine Knowledge is, and there is absolutely no change in it.
(
, 
, 
)
