چکیده:
The Shia Hadith research system in the contemporary period requires the recognition and reconstruction of signs that can be used to utilize the heritage left from the era of the Infallibles (peace be upon them) as a valid source with a clearer and more realistic mechanism. This requires precise identification of the common and usual methods among well-known past scholars and Hadith narrators. One of the Hadith researchers whose works have been of interest to jurists and thinkers of Islamic sciences since the time of their writing is Sheikh Hurr al-Amili. He sought to promote the Akhbari view and expand the circle of authenticity by recognizing and reconstructing credibility indicators in the Hadith research system of the predecessors and strengthening them. It seems that based on the historical realities of the evolution of validation, the views of Sheikh Hurr al-Amili can resolve some of the ambiguous points of this system and improve it. His most important views regarding the validation and valuation of Hadith are presented at the end of the book Wasa'il al-Shia under the title 'Fawa'id'. Re-reading these indicators is a guiding matter in recovering the system of the predecessors.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Hadith Research Scientific Semiannual Journal Year 12, Spring and Summer 1399, Number 23 Scientific-Research Article Pages: 53-74 Critique and Review of Validating Indicators in the Hadith Valuation System From the Perspective of Sheikh Hurr al-Amili with Reliance on the Fawa'id of Wasa'il al-Shia Hamid Baqeri 1 Seyyed Maziyar Hosseini 2 Abstract The Shiite hadith research system in the contemporary era requires the recognition and reconstruction of signs that can be used to utilize the remaining heritage from the era of the Infallibles (as) as a reliable source through a clearer and more realistic mechanism.
Some believe that the critique of reports remaining from the predecessors and the analysis of later scholars such as Sheikh Hassan bin Zayn al-Din al-Amili (1011 AH), who appears to be the first person to point out the fundamental differences between the hadith research of the predecessors and the later scholars, indicates that the Shiite valuation system in the hadith research tradition of the predecessors relied more on reliable external indicators than on the chain-of-narration (sanad) and biographical (rijali) analysis of the hadith.
Sheikh Hurr, in continuation, presents this example to strengthen his view: if a saying of Abu Hanifa or other scholars of the general public (Ammah) or the Imami is narrated from one of the predecessors or successors, such as Allamah al-Hilli or the two Martyrs (Shahidayn), or if a statement from a specific book is mentioned, when we refer to our conscience, we see that in our very souls, knowledge is attained regarding the truthfulness of their claim and the correctness of their speech, not mere conjecture; and this intuitive knowledge is an ordinary knowledge, just as we know that a mountain does not turn into gold and a sea does not turn into blood.
(
, 
, 
)
