چکیده:
According to prevailing philosophical views, the subject of first philosophy is 'absolute existence' or 'being insofar as it is being'; however, it is clear that the truth of this statement is conditional upon existence being judgable; meaning that its attribution to certain judgments and descriptions is possible. The claim of this article is that such a condition cannot be realized in existence. Therefore, existence is unjudgable, and it is not possible for 'absolute existence' or 'being insofar as it is being' to be the subject of philosophy.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The Unpredicability of Existence Hossein Ashaghi Abstract According to prevailing philosophical views, the subject of first philosophy is "absolute existence" or "the existent insofar as it is existent"; however, it is clear that the truth of this statement is conditional upon existence being predicable; meaning, its attribution to certain judgments and descriptions must be possible.
Explanation of why, based on the proof of the falsity and impossibility of the removal of two contraries from any assumed thing, for every assumed attribute that is apparently predicated of "absolute existence" in philosophical propositions, either "pure existence" is true or its negation, i.
Objection: Regarding the aforementioned reasoning, an objection might seem apparent, namely that in the three preceding possibilities, the falsity of the first possibility is flawed; because existential aspects such as unity, individuation, and necessity negate the proof of the falsity of the first possibility; because these aspects, since they are of the nature of existence, are not different from the reality of "absolute existence" in their essential determination and their true definition is one with the true definition of "absolute existence," yet despite this, they are predicated of existence and are among its judgments; as one can say "every existence is one" or "every existence is necessary (by essence or by another)"...
(
, 
, 
)
