چکیده:
Rejāl attenuations are one of the controversial parts in Rejāl science. Critics have pointed out just some of the factors which attenuate the narrators. Uncertainty begins when one pays attention to the practical conduct of followers in dealing with those who are accused of weakness on the one hand, and to the great differences among scholars of Rejāl on the other hand. Are these attenuations accurate and conform to reality or some of hidden factors have led scholars of Rejāl into confusion. A study of Shi’ite hadith history show that a set of factors together or alone, have caused these scholar to fall into the wrong about a person. This point can be proved by Rejāl books and their reports. The result of this mistake varied from uncertainty and cavil to highest attenuation. So, teachers and students were questioned and as a result of this mistake all of their traditions have become suspected. Due to importance of this issue, in this article we introduce these factors and practical examples, overall and exact trust about doubted attenuations, and provide an approach for further study on these attenuations.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Then he asked: "Should we pay zakat to those who oppose Hisham bin Hakam in Tawhid?" (Kashshi, 1348 SH, paragraph 503) -- Isa bin Sulayman wrote to Imam al-Kadhim(as): "May I be your sacrifice, should we pay zakat to those who are supporters of the theories of Yunus bin Abd al-Rahman?" (Ibid, paragraph 933) One of the cases that clearly demonstrates how problematic these theological disputes were for the Shiites is the story of the writing of a book against the Shiites.
Najashi, 1407 AH, paragraphs 1164, 463, 1165, and 886) The problem intensifies when it is noted that the authors of early Rijal books and the Rijal scholars before them rarely reported on the beliefs of the weak; rather, they would ultimately accuse the narrator of corruption of belief, and due to the lack of access to the theological foundations of the critics, a clear meaning of their deviation cannot be understood.
This shows that Ibn Walid has turned away from this method for specific reasons that indicate doubt regarding the manner of connection between these two and the lack of observance of the etiquettes of narration, but in the view of Rijal scholars and over time, this same factor has caused the weakening of one of the famous Shiite personalities.
" (Ibid, paragraph 977)3 It has also been reported that one of the criticisms that some spread about Yunus bin Abd al-Rahman was the accusation of narrating hadiths without sama'.
(
, 
, 
)
