چکیده:
This article examines a comparative study of the concept of "abject" in Forugh Farrokhzad's poem "Another Birth" with the concept of "abjection" in Julia Kristeva's "Powers of Horror". This article seeks to study the "abject" images based on a comparative reading with Kristeva's "Powers of Horror" in Forugh's "Another Birth". The reason for choosing Forugh Farrokhzad is that Kristeva's theory has great applicability to her poems. This theory, of course, covers a wider range of Farrokhzad's poems which is beyond the scope of this article. On the other hand, her poems are also very expressive as a central basis for illuminating Kristeva's theory regarding the phenomenon of abjection. Abjection is one of the most fundamental currents of the subject in the process: meaning a state of rejecting and repelling what is considered the 'other' for oneself, and through this, the self creates boundaries for an always unstable 'I'. The abject is something that a person rejects, repels, and drives away from themselves almost violently.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Discussion The key method in this article is the application of Julia Kristeva's abjection in the two mentioned poems of Forugh Farrokhzad.
The first thing the child considers abject is their point of origin, namely the mother, from whom they must draw a boundary between themselves and their mother; however, this is a difficult task because they were once within the mother's body and are now outside of it, which places the child in a dual bind: a longing for union with their primary love, the mother, and the need to break this union and begin individuality.
The first type of the phenomenon of pollution mentioned above exists inside and outside the body, just as Kristeva explains the difference between them in the degree of pollution of matters such as excrement and menstruation, which she discusses in "Powers of Horror": "Human waste and its equivalents threaten human identity in external cases.
The subject that Forugh Farrokhzad addresses in her poems is, in fact, the explainer of the phenomenon of abjection, which is the general framework of this article.
In this verse which says: "I sigh for you, oh sigh" In the reading of this poem which says: "I bind you with tree, water, and fire," the aforementioned point is understandable" (Farrokhzad, 1392: 42) The poetic persona alludes to a repetition by using the words "repeated and eternal," and it is stated in this way that the phenomenon of abjection is not an issue that can be addressed only once and comprehensively.
(
, 
, 
)
