چکیده:
Farrokhi is one of the poets of the Constitutional era who, through his poems, has contributed to the awakening of the people and the evolutionary process of society. His poems contain new themes and subjects that have disrupted the old and worn-out value system. Freedom is one of the themes that the poet has extensively addressed in his poems, referring to it as a 'beautiful witness' for which he is willing to sacrifice his life. Farrokhi is a freedom-seeker in every sense, considering the progress and prosperity of society to be contingent upon freedom. Out of intense compassion and love for his country, he encourages all members of society to show selflessness in the path of freedom; however, he demands freedom from all those who obstruct the stability of liberty. Farrokhi speaks in his poetry about examples of political and social freedom, such as freedom of the pen, freedom of expression, and freedom of the press, and considers their existence essential and necessary for democratizing society. In the pursuit of freedom, he fights against tyranny, reactionism, and capitalist colonialism. This research attempts to explain the dimensions of the poet's freedom-seeking and to clarify his thought regarding it.
خلاصه ماشینی:
" (Haeri, 9:1374) In the last two centuries, political, social, and economic thoughts regarding the rights of individuals and societies and their connection to ruling institutions have been described using the word "freedom," and its concept within the framework of what is called "Liberty" in Western political science terminology has been discussed.
Farrukhi has spoken of instances of political and social freedom in his poetry and has considered the existence of such freedoms essential and necessary for democratizing society.
This prominent poet becomes so despondent and hopeless regarding the improvement of society's pains and its laws that he resorts to suicide, so that in the assembly of the clergy of the afterlife, he may attain these freedoms and be liberated from the grip of suffocation, oppression, and tyranny: تا قلـم نگـرددآزاد،از قلـم نمـي کـنم يـاد گر قلم شود ز بيداد، همچو خامـه هـر دو دسـتم گر زنـم دم از حقـايق ،بـر مصـالح خلايـق شحنه مي کشد که رندم، شرطه مي کشد که مسـتم (Divan, 167) or مـــي روم در مجلـــس روحانيـــان آخـــرت وندر آنجـا بـي کتـک طـرح قـوانين مـي کـنم نامــه حقگــوئي طوفــان را بــه آزادي مــدام منتشر بـي زحمـت توقيـف و تـوهين مـي کـنم (Divan, 186) Given that political and social freedoms have both individual and social aspects, was the mere expression of issues related to freedom solely intended to pave the way for achieving his own fundamental rights, with the mentioned topics falling within the realm of individual behaviors?