چکیده:
This study has done to show the relation between metacognitive strategies with aggression and coping styles in Shiraz high school students. Methods: In this study, 360 individuals of Shiraz high school students between the ages 17-19 (240 females, 120 males) in 88-89 school year, were chosen by multi stage cluster sampling. Data collection was done with Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) by Cartwright Hatton & wells (2004), Aggression Questionnaire (AQ), and Coping Styles Questionnaire (CSQ).Statistic data were analyzed by the use of Pearson correlation coefficient, t-test for independent groups and multiple regression analysis. Results: Analysis showed that between metacognitive strategies and aggression, as well as between metacognitive strategies and ways of coping with stress in P<0.01, there is a significant relationship. In addition, among males and females, aggression at level p<0.001 and using coping styles at the level p<0.05 was a significant difference. It should be noted, cognitive confidence was a strong and significant predictor for aggression at p<0.001. Conclusion: The results showed that applying metacognitive strategies from high school youth have effects on behavioral disorders such as aggression, but it can help them use appropriate coping styles in different situations.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Cognitive self-awareness strategy was a strong and significant predictor for rational and emotional coping styles and the strategy of dangerous and uncontrollable thoughts old), results in unawareness of the potential consequences of aggressive acts or psychological inability to solve problems (instead of automatic externalization) (cited in Shakibayi et al.
1- Cognitive Confidence 2- Positive Beliefs about Worry 3- Cognitive Self- Conciousness 4- Uncontrollability and Danger Thoughts 5- Need to Control Thoughts 6 -Reliability 7-validity 8-Irak &amp; Toson 9 - Aggression Questionnaire 10 -Phisical Aggression 11 -Verbal aggression 12- Anger 13- Hostile Responses in this questionnaire were calculated based on a 5-point Likert scale (completely similar to me (5), somewhat similar to me (4), neither similar to me nor dissimilar to me (3), somewhat dissimilar to me (2), strongly dissimilar to me (1)).
S Dangerous and uncontrollable thoughts 0/16** 0/22** 0/30** 0/34** Need for thought control 0/18** 0/20** 0/24** 0/22** * p&lt;0/05 ** p&lt;0/01 To examine the relationship between metacognitive strategies and stress coping styles, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used, the results of which are presented in Table 2.
Discussion of Results The research findings, based on the data obtained from the Pearson correlation coefficient presented in Table 1, showed that among all metacognitive strategies except cognitive self-awareness, there was a significant positive relationship with all aggression scales at the P > 0.
(
, 
, 
)
