خلاصه ماشینی:
Due to these issues, the writer believes that the type of institutional design for pluralistic societies that adopts measures and creates consensus-oriented institutions—which encourage inter-ethnic balance in public offices and support all social cleavages in parliament and the sharing and division of power between different branches of government—is considered the most suitable and developed pattern.
This is because democracy explicitly acknowledges the presence of different and conflicting interests, allowing various groups In the introduction of the book, the author addresses the main topics, restates the primary question, and defines certain concepts; such as democratization, diversity based on tribal and clan affiliations like in Papua New Guinea, or the existence of cultural, linguistic, regional, and religious-sectarian identities like in Indonesia, or the distinctions of ethnic nationalism in Taiwan, or the intense regionalism found in Korea, which thinkers categorize all these divides under the heading of ethnicity.
The main issue of the book, given the political developments of the last two decades in the mentioned countries and the transition of their political systems toward democracy, the holding of free competitive elections, and the expansion of fundamental political freedoms despite the deep socio-cultural diversity of the mentioned societies along ethnic, linguistic, religious-sectarian, and regional lines, is whether an Asia-Pacific model of political engineering and development exists, and how political reformers in this region responded to the reality of their internal diversity through prudent, creative, and innovative forms and methods of political engineering?