چکیده:
Despite much research about pure-writing، no satisfying one about its history and theories has been conducted to date. The present paper aims to study the historical background of this writing method and its theoretical bases up to the constitutional era. This study shows that، contrary to what it seems، pure-writing is not a new method and its history dates back to the fifth century AH. Referring to remains of past periods، the article emphasizes that this kind of writing got increasing attention since the second half of the thirteenth century AH، under the influence of widespread Dasatiri terms especially the nationalism movement. This paper addresses the following questions: 1- Was pure-writing based on any particular theory of Shu'ubiyya in the previous periods? 2- Was there any relationship between pure-writing and nationalism? 3- If there were such a relationship، did all nationalist movements propagate pure-writing or just a some particular ones insisted on it?
خلاصه ماشینی:
One of &%06513MADG065G% The earliest of these references appears in the introduction of Shahmardan bin Abi al-Khayr to Rawdat al-Munajjimin (written, 466 AH); he writes in criticizing the style of some writers of his era: "Most peculiar of all is that when they compose a book in Persian, they say: 'For this purpose, we have used this expression so that he who does not know Tazi (Arabic) shall not be left without benefit'; then they utter words in a special absolute Dari that is more difficult than Tazi, and if they had uttered common words, knowing them would have been easier" (Bahār, 1369: 160/2).
In Iran, in addition to attending to the affairs of the Zoroastrians, he established relatively extensive relations with some Iranian modernists and through them propagated some of his beliefs; for instance, he had a friendly relationship and closeness with Jalal al-Din Mirza Qajar (died 1289 AH), the author of the most famous book written in pure Persian, and it was he who, while sending a letter to Mirza Fath-Ali Akhundzadeh (died 1295 AH), introduced this envoy of the Parsis of India to him with eloquent praise (Akhundzadeh, 1357:375) and opened the door of correspondence between the two.
Among those who were at the forefront of the modernism movement and, following the publication of Nameh-ye Khosravan, engaged in discussions regarding pure writing and the purification of the language from Arabic words, three individuals are the most prominent: Mirza Fath-Ali Akhundzadeh (died 1295 AH), Mirza Aqa Khan Kermani (died 1314 AH), and Mirza Abd al-Rahim Taluf Tabrizi (died 1328 AH).
(
, 
, 
)
