خلاصه ماشینی:
On the other hand, it is possible that this small statue belonged to a proto-Indian merchant settled in Mesopotamia, because according to Dikshit, merchants from the Central Asian lands always, without doubt, accepted contracts under the protection of deities1 that were represented in the form of "proto-Hanuman"2 or other animals whose images are engraved on seals found in Mesopotamian cities.
Despite this, artifacts that show an ancient kinship between the proto-Indian and Elamite inhabitants, and in this case, their location and origin are neither India nor Mesopotamia, (1)- sceau-amulette, (2)- enkida, (3)- gilgamesh, (4)- ernest ma-chay, (5)- early indus civilizations, (6)- taureau, (7)- portrait d''un pre?tre, (8)-.
Although archaeologists in India and Pakistan have discovered much more ancient cultures, they cannot be considered as sources of the Mohenjo-Daro, Harappa3, and other proto-Indian cities, because they show no genetic relationship4 with them.
A country named Elam- The indisputable similarity that the artifacts of the proto-Indian and Mesopotamian civilizations show might perhaps be explained by the belonging of the creators of the oldest civilization of India, namely the first conquerors of the Tigris and Euphrates basins, to nations that had kinship with each other and spoke Dravidian languages, or even to a single nation.
The third "proto-script9" shows traces that resemble Pre-Sumerian signs, namely the writings discovered in Harappa, Mohenjo-Daro, and other ancient cities of India.
In this case, the similarity between the Proto-Indic, Pre-Sumerian, and Proto-Elamite scripts is explained by their Dravidian origin.