چکیده:
The science of Jarh and Ta'dil is the scale for the narrators of Hadith; when they weigh heavy, they are accepted, and when they weigh light, they are rejected. In the field of this knowledge, regarding Ibn Ghada'iri, who is one of the great Shia Rijal scholars of the early era, due to his authorship of a book in which he has identified weak and blameworthy narrators within the domain of Shia Hadith, extensive and persistent discussions have taken place in later centuries, and many supporting and opposing views have been expressed about him. Some opponents have criticized his method in the criticism of Rijal and have accused him of hasty Jarh and excessive weakening of narrators. While addressing these views, the author argues that Ibn Ghada'iri, by focusing his thoughts on a specific center (the science of Rijal), was specialization-oriented rather than hasty; with expert and mature reflection, through short and very deliberate words, he addressed the criticism of the status of narrators in a methodical way, following the steadfast and scholarly method of the ancients and possessing a methodology of criticism.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In the field of this knowledge, regarding Ibn al-Ghadha'iri, who is one of the great Shia biographical scholars (Rijal) of the early era, a persistent and extensive debate has taken place in later centuries due to his authorship of a book in which he has identified weak and blameworthy narrators within the realm of Shia Hadith, and many supporting and opposing views have been expressed about him.
While addressing these views, the author argues that Ibn al-Ghadha'iri, by focusing his thoughts on a specific center (the science of Rijal), was specialization-oriented rather than hasty; with expert and mature reflection, through short and very measured remarks, he addressed the criticism of the narrators' status in a systematic manner, following the steadfast and scholarly method of the predecessors and possessing a methodology of criticism.
The intention is Muhammad Taqi Majlisi (Majlisi I), who believed in the invalidity of the statements in the book Al-Du'afa and considered Ibn al-Ghadha'iri to be unknown (majhul) and placed his trustworthiness under doubt (Amin, 2/565; Shushtari, Qamus al-Rijal, 1/442; Safari, Jaryan-shenasi-ye Ghulu (2), pp.
However, since Ibn al-Ghadha'iri considers the science of Rijal to be a specialization and views the process of disparagement (jarh) and validation (ta'dil) of narrators as a completely technical and scientific process, like other scholars of this art, he distinguishes between the weakness of the narrator in their school of thought[1] on one hand __________________________________ [1].
— Ibn al-Ghadha'iri al-Wasiti al-Baghdadi, Ahmad bin Husayn, al-Rijal, research by Muhammad Rida Hosseini Jalali, 1st edition, Qom, 1380 SH.
(
, 
, 
)
