چکیده:
In the present article, the method of using the narrative-oriented interpretive trend in narration is reviewed and analyzed. From the author's perspective, the fundamental methodological pathologies of this trend's interpretive approach can be traced back to two matters: first, the avoidance of examining the documentary evidence of narrations, and second, the avoidance of analyzing their semantic implications. The most important weaknesses in the second matter include the inaccurate matching of narrations to verses, the confusion of different linguistic domains of the Quran, and a superficial approach in selecting interpretive Hadiths based merely on verbal relationships. The new structure of the discussion, the types of analyses, and comparative examples are among the features of this writing.
خلاصه ماشینی:
A positive characteristic observed in some ancient tradition-oriented exegetical works, such as the Tafsir of Ibn Abi Hatim al-Razi and al-Tabari, is that despite the limitless and unregulated reporting in exegetical works, their chains of transmission (isnad) have also been mentioned.
Although not conducting a chain of transmission analysis is not very harmful in many exegetical hadiths that relate to recovering the semantic horizons of verses based on their implications, it is problematic in other areas such as the details of teachings and closed Quranic rulings; for example, the influx of non-Islamic ideas (Isra'iliyyat) regarding certain meanings of verses and fabricated tales such as the individual legend of a person named Uj ibn Anq with a height of more than 3333 cubits and his strange tale at the end of verses 12 and 21-22 of al-Ma'idah (see: al-Tabari, 1420 AH, vol.
Another example of inaccuracy in applying meaning to verses based on reliance on narrations is an interpretation of the verse "سَنَفْرُغُ لَكُمْ أَيُّهَا الثَّقَلَان" (Rahman: 31), which has received attention in hadith-oriented tafsir sources, and based on it, "Thaqalan" has been applied to the Quran and the Ahl al-Bayt (AS).
425), and also the narration, analysis, and investigation of a report from the book Mahasin, at the end of verses 17-19 of Surah Al-Layl, contrary to its famous interpretation in traditional works (see: ibid, vol.
Ibn Kathir; Tafsir al-Quran al-Azim; Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah, 1415 AH.
(
, 
, 
)
