چکیده:
Even if we do not consider religious experience to be of the same kind as mystical experience, mysticism is similar to religion in terms of having multiple dimensions. One of the dimensions of mysticism—alongside the ritual dimension, the doctrinal dimension, the institutional dimension, etc.—is its ethical dimension. Similarly to religion, this dimension of mysticism—like its other dimensions—has differences across various forms of mysticism. By accepting the existence of something called "Christian mysticism," this article examines the historical development of its ethical dimension and enumerates the various ethical traditions that have emerged within it.
خلاصه ماشینی:
This article, by accepting the existence of something called "Christian mysticism," examines the historical dimension of its ethics and enumerates the various ethical traditions that have emerged within it.
Assistant Professor in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Southern California, author of works on early medieval thought, philosophy of religion, and ethical theory.
An infinitely effective blend of mysticism, ethics, and metaphysics emerged from the writings of the third-century Neoplatonist philosopher, Plotinus (205-270).
In [the book] Mystical Theology and elsewhere in the collected works of Pseudo-Dionysius, God is considered hidden and transcendent.
In the Cistercian reform movement[4] in the twelfth century, this tradition led to the emergence of a rich collection of works that connect mystical love with _______________________________ [1].
His fame is due to the profound and eloquent essays, sermons, and treatises he wrote on theology, mysticism, and various aspects of Christian life, including his works: On the Degrees of Humility and Pride, On Love of God, On Grace and Free Will.
In the twentieth century, the paradigm for English-American philosophical approaches to this issue has been [Book] The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) by William James[3] (1842-1910).
Robert Aitken[1], an American Zen master and proponent of "deep ecology"[2] ethics, which is based on the Bodhisattva[3] ideal of Buddhism, whereas Arthur Danto[4], who holds a nominally Kantian position, believes that most forms of non-Western religious thought presuppose metaphysical views that necessitate the decline of morality.
(
, 
, 
)
