Abstract:
The matter of the will to donate the organs of a deceased Muslim is of emerging issues. However, in influence and its lack of influence among jurists there is no consensus. The differences, in turn, are due to the variations in reasons for implementation. These reasons include the truth or falsehood of the desecration of the deceased, the mutilation of the deceased, Members’ ownership and monarchy of man over the deceased, the prohibition of profit from components, delays in burying the deceased, and the requirement to fulfill obligations. Regarding that a view to the conclusion of different perspectives and critical attention to their fundamentals are particularly important to find the correct view, this article tries to re-examine the views and arguments presented. According to the warrant, issues must be deduced from Scripture and tradition. The final research approach is the influence of the mentioned will of the deceased based on the primary rulings, evidenced by reasons such as the established perception of the goodness of the influence of the above-mentioned will in the eyes of the wise, the transformation in the function of the deceased members, public arguments of will influence, and the absence of conflict.
Machine summary:
It is clear that one of the easy and safe ways to access human organs is through a will to donate organs after death; a matter that faces challenges and obstacles in light of the widespread disagreement among jurists and the prevalence of a view that prohibits the validity of the aforementioned will or at least restricts it to titles such as necessity and the like.
E) A view that considers this will permissible if saving a life or treating an illness depends on it and cutting the transplanted organ does not lead to the conventional title of mutilation or desecration of the deceased (Khamenei, 1420, vol.
Impermissibility of Delaying Burial Willing to donate organs after death entails delaying burial due to the separation of the organ, and this delay is not permissible by the indication of narrations that recommend haste in preparing the Muslim deceased and the members of his body (Hurr Amili, 1409, vol.
The argument of reason Organ transplantation, donation, will, and acting on it to save a life or health of a respected person is considered a good act by reason, and reason is independent in the existence of the benefit of these matters, and with the addition of the connection between the ruling of reason and Sharia, the permissibility of these matters and the validity of the will are established from the point of view of Sharia.
(
, 
, 
)
