Abstract:
maysam musai malihe sheyani ammar chappi nooshabadi abstract centralization and decentralization are two important economic approaches that countries have adopted over time in response to their societal needs. this study seeks to analyze iranian society through the lens of these two approaches within the context of economic sociology and development. it considers both the current state of iran and the potential conditions that could influence the country’s economic and developmental trajectory. to bridge the gap between theoretical concepts and the practical realities of iranian society, development plans have been used as a foundation for data extraction and analysis. a key feature of this research is the use of content analysis to explore both the existing economic situation and the possible future conditions. this method combines both inductive and deductive approaches. for an alternative economic structure, the study synthesizes core concepts of federalism and free-market economy. the data collected has been analyzed using maxqda and spss software, with tables and results presented and accompanied by detailed interpretations.
Machine summary:
Quarterly Journal of Development Strategy / Year 20 / No. 3 (Serial 79) / Autumn 2024 / 131-159 Quarterly Journal of Development Strategy, 2024, Vol. 20, No. 3 (79), 131-159 A Sociological Analysis of the Lack of Economic Federalism in Development Plans After the Islamic Revolution of Iran 1 Ammar Chapi Nushabadi 2 Meysam Mousaaei 3 Maliheh Shiani (Received date: 2023/10/16 - Approved date: 2023/10/28) Article Type: Scientific-Research Abstract Centralization and decentralization in economy are two important approaches that countries have employed over many years, each according to the requirements of their own society.
One of these dimensions is the sociological analysis of this issue in Iran, which, to achieve greater realization and link it with the current realities of Iranian society, we will address by analyzing the content of development plans after the Islamic Revolution in light of related theories.
A noteworthy point is that Keynesian theories are proposed at a time when the pole of the capitalist economy experienced an economic crisis in the 1930s and also experiences periodic economic recessions, the most important of which is the issue of unemployment, which according to Keynes resulted from aggregate demand; however, this research is about Iranian society, and in the author's view, Iran has not yet entered the stage of capitalism that would cause it to experience a recession.
(
, 
, 
)
