Hafs's narration of Asim's recitation Journal Article

Machine summary:

Of course, it has also been stated in some cases that the difference in narration is due to conformity or non-conformity with the orthography (rasm al-khatt) of the Uthmanic Mushaf; for example, in the recitations "kafu'a ahad" and "kafi'a ahad," where the former is the narration of "Hafs" and the latter is the narration of "Shu'bah," it is said that "kafu'a" conforms to the Uthmanic orthography, unlike "kafi'a. For example, in explaining the reason for the correctness of the "Hafs" narration, it is stated that the words "Jibril" and "Mikail" are non-Arabic, and through the recitation "Jibril," like "Qatmir" and "Mikal," they have taken on an Arabic color following the weight of "Maf'al". Some Shia jurists who also preferred the "Hafs" narration have stated in justifying the reason for the accusative case (nasb) of "arjul" that the verb "mash" can take an object both with the preposition "bi" (with) and without it; in other words, "mas-huhu" and "mas-h" both have the same meaning, and the letter "ba" merely indicates that a portion of the head and foot should be wiped. 7. لا یؤاخذکم اللّه باللغو فی أیمانکم و لکن یؤاخذکم بما عقّدتم الأیمان فکفّارته اطعام‌ عشرة مساکین (Ma'idah, 98/5) Shu'bah Narration: bima aqadtum (without tashdid) In explaining the "Hafs" narration, it has been said that "aqqadtum" means "akkadtum", and Almighty God says: «و لا تنقضوا الأمیان بعد توکیدها» (Nahl, 19/61) and emphasis (ta'kid) in an oath is the opposite of "laghw", and "laghw" means lack of belief and weakness of faith.