Abstract:
Among Muslims, after the ascension of the Prophet (PBUH), poetic and prose narratives in Persian and Arabic emerged regarding the Miraj. These works, which can be considered an independent genre due to the presence of common structural and content indicators, are known as Miraj-namas. The purpose of writing this article was to analyze the structural and content components of this literary genre. To this end, while identifying Persian poetic Miraj-namas from the first ones to the second half of the tenth century AH, we examined the structural and content characteristics of these works using an analytical-descriptive method. Based on the research results, poets, in terms of content, have maintained a degree of integrity due to citing sources such as the Quran, traditions, and history; accordingly, we observed twenty-six similar patterns in their works. Sometimes, due to religious, jurisprudential, and theological differences, as well as the element of imagination, the number of patterns was higher in later works compared to earlier ones, and the Miraj-namas were longer. The frequent use of rhetorical devices in Miraj-namas of the Iraqi style has not been able to push the content to the margins and place literature at the center of the Miraj-namas; therefore, these works are familiar to the minds and language of the audience in terms of literary and linguistic aspects. From Sanai onwards, poetic Miraj-namas initially appeared within larger genres and gradually, at the beginning of poetic collections with unique stylistic features, continued to live among Muslim poets and were able to be recognized as an independent genre in literature despite some commonalities with other types.
Machine summary:
1-41 Research Article Analysis of the Structural and Content Components of Meraj-namehs from the Beginning to the Second Half of the Tenth Century 2 Ebrahim Khodayar1, Samira Shafiee (Received: 2024/10/20, Accepted: 2024/12/17) Abstract Among Muslims, after the ascension of the Prophet (PBUH), verse and prose narratives in Persian and Arabic emerged regarding the Meraj.
To this end, while identifying Persian verse Meraj-namehs from their earliest forms to the second half of the tenth century AH, we examined the structural and content characteristics of these works using a descriptive-analytical method.
Ibrahim Khodayar and Nizami, Mantiq al-Tayr by Attar, Divan of Kamal Isfahani, Divan of Saqazi, Divan of Farid Isfarayini, Divan of Marqi, Masnavi of Molavi, Munis al-Ahrar by Darraj Jarmi, Divan of Iraqi, Bustan of Saadi, Divan of Farghani, Divan of Hasan Kashani, Kanz al-Rumuz by Husayni Heravi, Gulshan-e Raz by Shabistari, Matla al-Anwar by Amir Khusrau Dehlavi, Divan of Hasan Dehlavi, Divan of Owladi, Khamsa of Khwaju, Futuh al-Salatin by Issami, Divan of Ibn Yamin, Divan of Imad Faqih, Divan of Nasir Bukhara'i, Jamshid and Khurshid by Savaji, Mehr and Mushtari by Assar, Divan of Jahan Malik Khatun, Divan of Hafez, Munis al-Ushaq by Arabshah, Rawzat al-Muhibbin by Ibn Imad Khorasani, Divan of Kamal Khujandi, Kulliyat of Anwar, Divan of Ismat Bukhari, Divan of Khosravi, Kulliyat of Shah Da'i, Layli and Majnun by Maktabi, Divan of Hilali, Tamarnama by Hatifi, Kulliyat of Ahli, Divan of Ardistani and Divan of Khayali.