Abstract:
The Prisoners(Men or Womens) capability for rehabilitation is a Major hypothesis of Correctional criminology, and the Necessity of Creating a methodical program for prisoner re-entry to the Society is a main purpose of it. The purpose of this article is to Criminological and Sociological examine the Treatment policy and its Methods. This research has a descriptive and analytical methods, and Referring with a new Criminological approaches in regard Correctional Criminology. The findings of this study showed that the prison treatment program is inherently rooted in societies facts and expectations, and this program is tailored to the individual and social differences between men and women, in addition to joint plans, it also has independent measures. The results of this study showed that Implementation of a specific and restrictive approach, as well as the implementation of traditional methods, cannot change the behavior of prisoners. Therefore, the rules and regulations governing the idea of reforming prisoners in prison should be adapted to the conditions and characteristics of different categories of male and female prisoners. While using common and reforming ideas, specific models should also be taken into account for women and men in prison, to add to the prisons remedial capability and prison system and the possibility of a successful and normative return of convicts to the society.
Machine summary:
The findings of this research showed that the reform and treatment program for prisoners is specifically influenced by the realities and expectations of a free society and, in proportion to the individual and social differences between women and men, in addition to a set of common executive plans and methods, it also has independent and unique measures.
While benefiting from general and common reformatory teachings, differential and special approaches and patterns regarding convicted women and men must also be considered so that the reformative capabilities of the penal environment and the prison system, as well as the probability of the successful and norm-abiding return of convicts to free society, can be increased.
The thought and program of correction and treatment, by regarding criminals and offenders (both women and men) as patients and, in fact, through a pathological perception of them1, seeks to discover and introduce the most important corrective measures and methods for managing and changing their behavior in the penal environment and the continuation and development of those measures into the post-release stage.
Cullen and colleagues, in a study aimed at answering the question of whether the idea of rehabilitation and treatment of convicts is dead or not, have examined the evolutionary course, substantive issues, and general position of this idea within the text of the legal structures of society and have stated that reformative criminology, logically and substantively has no conflict with the historical policies of criminal law, and the challenge between them is studyable and reconcilable at the level of the methods of implementing measures and formal issues (Cullen, et al, 1988).
(
, 
, 
)
