Machine summary:
They are right to think so, but their studies, which are intended to guide an effective crime prevention policy, cannot be very useful or valuable in treating any specific case, because in these studies it cannot be determined whether the goal of their efforts is to determine the effects of these factors on the set of psychological characteristics of the child, or on their rational faculties, emotions, or behavior?" It is evident that the work of statisticians is nothing more than the simple counting and showing of the relationships between criminal acts and crime-causing factors.
"There is no dispute that role models and risky behaviors are crime-inducing, whether they are presented to children intentionally or are the result of a chaotic life, or generally due to raising the child in unsuitable housing and low and humble dwellings, or whether the bad teachings of parents, friends, corrupting scenes in the streets, the press, characters, and actors on cinema screens have caused the emergence of crime; what matters is that the qualitative nature of the psychological currents of these harmful factors be revealed.
" The action of the contaminating suggestive and identification socio-psychological mechanisms passes through the framework of the child's relationships with family or indigenous, social, economic, educational, or professional groups.
Chazal reflected on the rejection or acceptance of all these theories and identified and wrote that the criminogenic nature of film regarding the child is related to their life in the real world through cinematographic perception, and that this matter should be measured according to the behaviors...