Abstract:
The arrival of modernity in Iran has been accompanied by several challenges, In the face of modernity, Iranian society has been concerned with preserving its indigenous identity.The challenges of the last century in Iran show that Iranian society has not had a problem with modernity Rather, it was at odds with the altruistic ideology that overshadowed modern thought. With the victory of the Islamic Revolution, the confrontation between tradition and modernity, which was considered a historical heritage, also showed itself.Each of the post-revolutionary statesmen became hostile to the pro-Western ideology due to the requirements of the revolution. But with modernity and the Faustian machine, modern development not only had no problem, but also played a role as the driving force of modernity. The leading article seeks to highlight the post-revolutionary Iranian governments in advancing modern development Despite ideological conflicts with the pro-Western ideology, which manifested itself in hostility to the West. In order to prove the above claim in a descriptive and analytical way, this article has also used the combined theoretical model of Faust Goethe, Lacan's instructor and Habermas's biological world.
Machine summary:
In any case, the expansion of privatization, political deadlock, emphasis on cultural and artistic diversities with a tolerant view, emphasis on citizenship rights, and interaction with the world were among the most prominent 27 organized political participation (political indicator), emphasis on reviving Islamic values within the framework of the principlist current, while maintaining coexistence with new cultural processes in the field of culture and art (cultural indicator), addressing the affairs of the lower classes through the implementation of the targeted subsidy plan while simultaneously liberalizing prices (social indicator), and nuclear negotiations and efforts for interaction with the West (international indicator) are considered among the most prominent Faustian indicators of modern development that were addressed during the Ahmadinejad government.
32 Figure (2) Looking at the West through the approach to modernity Government | Symbolic Aspect | Approach to Faustian Development | Ideological Perspective (Modern Achievements) | Critique of the Faustian Development Model Mousavi | Implementation of some principles of Faustian development | Rejection of - Anti-Americanism | Acceptance Hashemi | Interaction with the acceptance of the Faustian development model | Adaptation with the acceptance of the Faustian development model Khatami | Emphasis on dialogue with the West | Acceptance of the Faustian development model | Internal and external Ahmadinejad | Islamic nature | A type of return to ideals | Rejection of - Acceptance of pragmatism in relation to the lower classes | Acceptance with America Rouhani | Emphasis on interactionism | Emphasis on interaction with the West | Acceptance of the Faustian development model in the form of economic logic | Internal and external Raisi | Rejection - Adopting an approach based on justice-centeredness | Acceptance of the pattern with reliance on facts and reality | With America 33 References ‒ Abrahamian, Ervand (2019), Modern Iran, translated by Mohammad Ibrahim Fattahi, 20th edition, Tehran, Ney Publication.
(
, 
, 
)
