Abstract:
This article aims to investigate newly emerging issues in the field of 'birth control'. The issue in question can be examined from the perspective of secondary rulings that operate under necessity, and it can also be studied from the viewpoint of governmental rulings. However, since secondary and governmental rulings are subject to change based on necessities and interests, this article has not examined this topic from that angle. This writing first presents four theories regarding population, which are: 1- Pro-population growth theory; 2- Anti-population growth theory; 3- Constant population theory; 4- Proportional population theory, and then examines the compatibility of Islamic views with one of the stated opinions. Subsequently, various ways to prevent procreation are presented, and while stating the existing rulings in each field, the jurisprudential ruling on the use of these methods is investigated, and finally, a conclusion is drawn.
Machine summary:
1 b) Indication of the Hadith In six cases, the ruling has been issued as the permissibility of coitus interruptus; therefore, in other cases, meaning coitus interruptus regarding a permanent free wife, "there is no harm in it" (fihi ba's), and this expression is evidence for prohibition.
3 2- Sahih or Muwathaq of Muhammad bin Muslim Muhammad bin Yaqub, from Ahmad bin Muhammad al-Asimi, from Ali bin al-Hasan bin Nidal, from Ali bin Asbat, from his paternal aunt Yaqub bin Salim, from Muhammad bin Muslim, from Abu Ja'far (AS), who said: "There is no harm in coitus interruptus from a free woman if her husband desires it, and if she dislikes it, she has no right regarding this matter.
"4 Muhammad bin Muslim narrates from Imam Baqir (AS) that His Eminence said: There is no obstacle to coitus interruptus from a free woman if the man desires it, and if the woman is dissatisfied, she has no right regarding this matter.
Jurisprudential Ruling Considering that procreation is not obligatory, and on the other hand, this mechanism does not cause harm to the woman and also does not necessitate the commission of another forbidden act, and with attention to the evidence of the chapter of 'azl (coitus interruptus), the legal ruling for using the aforementioned mechanism is not prohibition, and there is no evidence available for the proscription of this method.
(
, 
, 
)
