چکیده:
Rahat al-Sudur and Ayah al-Surur is one of the historical texts of Persian prose regarding the affairs of the Seljuks of Iraq, which Mohammad Ravandi, one of the capable writers of the Persian language, has written in technical prose—the customary and common style of that time. The prose of this book is not uniform; in sections that are purely historical, it is simple and unpretentious, but in discussions where the discourse demands it, such as the book's introduction, the entries to discussions, or specific issues like the enthronement and death of kings, etc., the author has employed all poetic and literary subtleties as much as possible, creating a beautiful example of Persian prose. Like many writers of technical prose, Ravandi has used many Persian and Arabic poetic evidences; so much so that he has quoted one thousand seven hundred and seventy-eight verses from only Persian-speaking poets. The most prominent characteristic of the literary dimension of his prose is the Quranic citations and allusions, which are often translated in verse or rhymed prose. In the linguistic dimension, especially in the use of verbs, the characteristics of Ghaznavid-era prose are evident. New compounds such as 'tank-e zavabeh', 'Tahmten-e del', 'Heydar-e tan'... and terms from astronomy, chess, medicine, etc., are also noteworthy in Rahat al-Sudur. In this article, an attempt has been made to analyze and examine the stylistic features of this work from three dimensions—linguistic, literary, and intellectual—to make its precise stylistic points clearer, especially from the linguistic and literary perspectives.
خلاصه ماشینی:
183-202) Yadollah Bahmani Motlagh 1 (Corresponding Author), Shirzad Tayefi 2, Melaat Najafi Arab 3 Date received: 2010/12/21; Date of final acceptance: 2011/03/24 Abstract: Rahat al-Sudur wa Ayat al-Surur is one of the historical texts of Persian prose regarding the affairs of the Seljuks of Iraq, which Muhammad Rawandi, a talented writer of the Persian language, has written in technical prose - the customary and prevalent style of that time.
Regarding the balance and parallelism that the late Bahar writes: "is rarely seen except in specific cases," it must be said that, apart from the sections dedicated to mentioning history and precise historical matters, he often uses them, and investigation and reflection on this book show that the author tends to use verbal and semantic devices in his speech as much as possible.
According to Khatibi, "the attention of the writers of this period (6th and 7th centuries) to the diversity and innovation of metaphorical expressions, allegories, and the arrangement of phrases through verbal and rhetorical devices and avoidance of vulgarity, was significantly greater than the manner of organizing and coordinating meanings and concepts that were carefully attended to and followed in the simple prose of the previous period.
Among the prominent points that must be considered when examining the stylistic features of each book is the attention to compositions, vocabulary, sentence structure, phrasing, and the combination of words within the sentence structure; from this perspective, a precise approach to Raha al-Sudur makes us notice subtle and fine points, the mention of some of which is necessary here.