خلاصه ماشینی:
*** From the author's perspective, considering the history and how the capitalist mode of production and socio-political system emerged and grew in Europe (in the 18th and 19th centuries AD), as well as the emergence and growth of the national industrial capitalist class (bourgeoisie) in these societies, it can be said that liberalism was the political method of this growing class in capitalist societies, facing traditional and autocratic governments from a political standpoint and fighting against the economic structure of feudalism so that the movement of capital and labor could be ensured from a political, legal and economic be ensured.
@Anyone who opposes political liberalism and liberal democracy must also oppose economic liberalism (private sector capitalism) and consequently oppose the economic power of a minority (the private sector), because privatization and the empowerment of a minority means the capitalist system and mode of production, the negation of freedom, populism, and the establishment of liberal democracy.
It is the same capitalist mode of production that in our society is called economic democracy, free market, or free economy by some shy economists; and what is meant by political liberalism is individual freedoms within the framework of the capitalist mode of production and its economic and class boundaries.
With attention to these points, anyone who opposes political liberalism and liberal democracy must also oppose economic liberalism (private sector capitalism) and consequently oppose the economic power of a minority (the private sector), because privatization and the empowerment of a minority means the capitalist system and mode of production, the negation of freedom, populism, and the establishment of liberal democracy.