Machine summary:
"According to the realism view, ethics, in its isness and place of subsistence, (dar maqam-i thubout) is independent of religion, and that definite intellect, regardless of religion, is able to essentially and intrinsically discover the goodness and evilness of actions.
Up to now, we have explained the Adliya's view who believe that goodness and evilness of actions are intrinsic and essential and that the ethical values and obligations (arzisha wa luzoumhaye akhlaqi), regardless of any instruction and recommendation or any personal sentiment and taste or any agreement and arrangement, are real and that the goodness and evilness of actions are resulted from external objects and actual facts.
According to this view, ethical concepts like goodness, evilness, rightness, uprightness, trueness and untrueness have no correspondence to the objective reality in the external world, but it is an objective reality which is described by the intellect by comparing that objective reality and the final aim, that is, men's prosperity.
Unrealism View In contrast to realism's view, unrealism's view: a group of western philosophers in general and some Muslim theologians Ash'arietes, another group of Muslim theologians in particular, believe that goodness and evilness of actions are purely conventional, contain no objective reality, depend totally on agreements or God's commands and forbiddance or God's will.
So, just as there are independent moral standards where the intellect can understand them in place of subsistence (dar maqam-I thobout), there is also God’s will which definite intellect is able to unveil and discover the goodness and evilness of actions through His command and forbiddance."