Abstract:
The paper aims to depict the crucial role of a number of domestic factors facilitating the conclusion of Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action JCPOA in Vienna. For attaining this goal, the paper highlights the dynamics of two under-analyzed factors. These factors include the consensus being built in 2012 among the reference groups of business and security communities over the concept of security; and the emergence of policy broker coalition, which mediated between the rival policy positions over the nuclear issue. A hybrid conceptual model and a mixed of quantitative and qualitative research methods are used to substantiate the paper’s argument.
Machine summary:
"Figure-1: Zero Flexibility Framework Three Layered Belief System Militarized Security;The west wants to destroy the regime Sanction are good for the country Technological International development cooperation is a necessity hurt Iran's fborrannadtiinogn industry Natanz never Arak Site shstooupldpbde never stops military isnpection ; NPTadditiona never set a Fordow sites nelveprraogcroeled foot in the never stops national territory In fact, the approach of the Z.
In fact, the inspection of the Parchin military site was already performed in Sep. 2015 by the Iranian personnel under the supervision of the IAEA (NASRALLA, 2015); a middle ground to meet the demands of all sides Conclusion When the first steps were taken by the newly inaugurated Iranian government for serious negotiations in September 2013, many questioned the willingness and ability of Iran to change its nuclear policy due to the factionalism within the political system and took that step as mere a tactical gesture of a state challenged by the international sanctions.
This paper aimed to examine two important but not exclusive domestic factors at work in the process of nuclear policy/diplomacy change resulting in the joint Comprehensive Plan Action JCPOA between Iran and the six world powers.
The analysis exhibited the underlying controversy over the nuclear policy instruments, showing that there have been two antagonistic world views with opposite approaches to the international politics and Iran’s security threats and values embedded in the economic development strategies."